[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Website:http://www.davidpublisher.com/Home/Journal/UCLR
Frequency: monthly
Volume 21, Number 7, July 2024 (Serial Number 195)
2. The factors that
are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance,
originality, readability and language.
3. The possible decisions
include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
4. If authors are
encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the
revised submission will be accepted.
5. Rejected
articles will not be re-reviewed.
6. Articles may be
rejected without review if they are obviously not suitable for publication.
7. The paper
acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force
regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
8. The staff must
not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than
the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the
publisher, as appropriate.
9. Reviews should
be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate.
Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
10. Peer-review
assists the publisher in making editorial decisions may also assist the author
in improving the paper.
11. Manuscripts
received for review are treated as confidential documents and are reviewed by
anonymous staff.
12. A reviewer
should also call to the publisher's attention any substantial similarity or
overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published
paper of which they have personal knowledge.
13. Authors of
contributions and studies research should present an accurate account of the
work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance.
14. A paper should
contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the
work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical
behavior and are unacceptable.
15. The authors
should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the
authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been
appropriately cited or quoted.
16. Submitting the
same manuscript to more than one publication concurrently constitutes unethical
publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
17. Authorship
should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the
conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study.
18. All sources of
financial support for the project should be disclosed.