 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Yassir M. Mahgoub Khalid M. Alsoud
Full-Text PDF
XML 1525 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2015.06.012
University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan King Faisal University, Al-Hasa, Saudi Arabia
This paper studies the impact of handicrafts on the promotion of cultural and economic development for students of art education in higher education through handicrafts based on local customs and traditions. Descriptive, analytical, and experimental methods are used in this research. The results of the study are expected to benefit from the results of this study to provide planners handicrafts in the Ministry of Education. An effective strategy can affect the teaching and learning of handicrafts, the protection of its features and its presence and identity. The study sample consists of 45 students of the third level, batch 2012–2013, from the faculty of Education at the University of Khartoum, Republic of the Sudan. The researchers to prepare topics for handicrafts depend on the use of local materials and units which are derived from the environment and represent the Artistic heritage that is shown through handicrafts (pottery, ceramics, calligraphy, decoration, carpet weaving and textile, sewing, embroidery, sculpture and engraving on wood, metal works, and printing works). The researchers focuse that the students learn the value of handicrafts in terms of economic and method of production and take advantage of it to increase the income of the individual product. The results confirms the existence of a difference in the quality and value of handicrafts for students in both groups: the experimental and control group, which confirms that the handcrafts lead to the promotion of cultural and economic development for students of art education in higher education. The researchers are recommended to consider of this topic as a main component which enables an area for further studies to develop different strategies in the field of handicrafts, for students to recognize the importance of the handicrafts value in terms of economic and method of production and take advantage of it to increase the income of the individual product.
handicrafts, cultural, economic, art education
Bennet, C. A. (1937). History of manual and industrial education 1870 to 1917. Peoria IL: TheManual Arts Press.
Dowell, M., & Avery, J. (2006). A report on traditional crafts and economic development in Michigan. Michigan State University Museum. (This report was prepared under a grant from Michigan Council for Arts and Cultural Affairs. A downloadable copy is available at: www.craftworksmichigan.org)
Gerelowitz, M. N. (1988). Iron production in prehistoric Europe. Journal of Metals, 40(6), 52-53.
Gomez, A. (2001). Manual arts movement. Retrieved from https://www.imagine101.com/manual.htm
Grue-Sorensen, K. (1961). History of education. Porvoo: WSOY.
J.R. Burrows & Company. (2003, October 1). Arts & crafts movement furniture for the Idaho building at the Columbian exposition, Chicago, 1893. Retrieved from https://www.burrows.com/founders/furniture.html
Jaitely, J. (2005, September). Crafts as industry. Retrieved 2007, April 4 from http://www.india-seminar.com/semsearch.htm
Kerschensteiner. G. (Ed.) (1910). Fundamental questions of school organization; a collection of speeches, articles and examples organization. Leipzig, Teubner, 23-43.
Mikkelsen, L., & Hagen-Wood, M. (1998). Experiences in taking crafts to market. New York: Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Division Publications.
Stickley, G. (1972). Simplicity and domestic life. In L. Mumford (Ed.), Roots of contemporary American architecture. 37 essays from the mid-nineteenth century to the present (pp. 299- 305). New York: Dover Publications, Inc..
Stickley, G. (2009). Craftsman homes and bungalows. New York: Sky horse Publishing, Inc..