 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
New Conglomerates and the Ecosystem Advantage
Nigel Walton
Full-Text PDF
XML 1253 Views
DOI:10.17265/1537-1514/2014.07.001
Nigel Walton, senior lecturer, MBA., Dip. M., (BA (Hons), Worcester Business School, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom.
It is the purpose of this paper to explore the emergence of a new form of web-based company and how the new organisational form is able to access multiple-markets and industries by exploiting the benefits of a platform ecosystem business model. Internet-based companies such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Apple were referred to as the “Gang of Four” in May, 2011, by Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google. These 21st century companies are leading an internet-based consumer revolution which is having a disruptive impact on a broad range of industries and markets. Using their platform-based ecosystems, the internet-based corporations are able to leverage these core competencies and enter industries that appear unrelated to their core businesses. This has given rise to a new form of conglomerate business model that contrasts with the Western industrial conglomerates of the 1960s and early 1970s. Most of these corporations were broken-up in the early 1980s and the remaining core businesses resorted to focused strategies. The paper also analyses why the new internet-based firms do not follow the positioning school of strategy and seek monopolistic rents—profits arising from market power—by locating in attractive industries. Instead, these firms leverage core competencies and achieve Ricardian economic rents—profits arising from superior resources—through strategies of stretch and leverage. By adopting a core competency tree configuration, a core competency platform is leveraged which allows the internet-based firms to enter multiple markets using asset-light business models. This new form of competitive advantage is based on having a superior ecosystem that uses data as the key resource instead of capital; capital being the main resource underpins the success of the traditional Western conglomerates of the 1960s and early 1970s.
ecosystem, internet, platform, conglomerate, core competency, industry structure
Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Gupta, A., & Kauffman, R. J. (2008). Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 779-809.
Ashton, K. (2009). That “internet of things” thing, in the real world things matter more than ideas. Retrieved from http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4986
Davenport, H., Leibold, M., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Strategic management in the innovation economy. Erlangen: Wiley/Publicis.
Davis, G. F., Diekmann, K. A., & Tinsley, C. H. (1994). The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59(4), 547-570.
Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82-115). San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.
Fransman, M. (2010). The new ICT ecosystem: Implications for policy and regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gartner Technology Research. (2013). Gartner says worldwide PC shipments in the third quarter of 2013 declined 8.6 percent. Retrieved from: http://www.gartner.com.
Gawer, A. (2009). Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 45-76). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft and Cisco drive industry innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Grant, R. M. (2008). Contemporary strategy analysis (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75-84.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. (2013). IFPI Digital Music Report 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ifpi.org
Johnston, M. (2000). Takeover: The new wall street warriors: The men, the money, the impact. Frederick: Beard Books.
McGhee, J., & Thomas, H. (1986). Strategic groups: Theory, research, and taxonomy. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 141-160.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Prentice Hall.
Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership & strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Collins.
Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.
Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62-78.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Publishers Association (2013). Amazon sells more e-books than printed titles. Retrieved from http://www.publishers.org.uk
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Can capitalism survive? Creative destruction and the future of the global economy. New York: Harper Perennial.
Slater, R. (1999). The titans of takeover. Frederick: Beard Books.
Sobel, R. (1999). The rise and fall of the conglomerate kings (2nd ed.). Frederick: Beard Books.
Walton, N. (2012). Four-closure: How Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google are driving business model innovation. Chinese Business Review, 11(11), 981-988.