Contact us
 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Nicholas Kut Ochogo, Charles Mallans Rambo, Joyce Kanini Mbwesa, Paul Amollo Odundo
Full-Text PDF
XML 5656 Views
DOI:doi: 10.17265/1537-1506/2014.12.004
Affiliation(s)
Nicholas Kut Ochogo, Ph.D., University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Charles Mallans Rambo, Ph.D., University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joyce Kanini Mbwesa, Ph.D., University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Paul Amollo Odundo, Ph.D., University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
ABSTRACT
Institutional support is an essential antecedent for lecturer’s preparedness for e-learning. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of institutional support through appropriate training programs and budgetary allocation on lecturers’ preparedness for e-learning at the University of Nairobi. A cross-sectional survey design was applied to source data from 212 lecturers and 96 administrative staff. Both quantitative and qualitative techniques were applied to process, analyze, and interpret the data. Quantitative analysis yielded descriptive statistics as well as cross tabulations with Chi-square (x2) statistic. The study found lack of significant relationship between lecturer’s preparedness for e-learning and knowledge of the existence of an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) training program. The existing training program was still underdeveloped in terms of funding and strategies. Lecturers’ preparedness for e-learning was also not significantly associated with perceived effectiveness of the existing training program; but was significantly related to training in software tools, as well as the source of funding for training. Although a team of ICT experts has been mandated to help academic staff prepare for e-learning, the team’s functionality was constrained by under-funding and multiple roles. Lecturer’s preparedness for e-learning also significantly associated with perceived adequacy of budgetary allocation for ICT program at the departmental level. Under-funding was a key factor constraining access to computers at the workplace, reliable internet connectivity and timely technical support, all of which significantly associated with lecturers’ preparedness for e-learning. Universities in resource-poor settings should consider creating necessary partnerships to create avenues for information and resource sharing, revamp existing training programs with financial and human resources, create linkages with funding institutions, as well as improve budgetary allocation to ensure universal access to functional computers at the workplace, reliable internet connectivity and timely technical support.
KEYWORDS
institutional support, preparedness, e-learning, training program, budgetary allocation
Cite this paper
References
Abbad, M., Morris, D., & Nahlik, C. (2009). Factors affecting student and lecturer use of e-learning systems in Jordan. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1-22.
Agboola, A. K. (2005). Assessing the awareness and perceptions of academic staff in using e-learning tools for instructional delivery in a post-secondary institution: A case study of the International Islamic University of Malaysia. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 112-120.
Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies in Syrian Tertiary Institutions. Journal of Computer and Education, 47(1), 373-398.
Aldrich, S. T., & Nelson, P. D. (1984). Advanced quantitative techniques for social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Ashley, D., & Orenstein, D. M. (2005). Sociological theory: Classical statements (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Babbie, E. R. (1973). Survey research methods. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Bates, A. W. (1997). The impact of technological change on open and distance learning. Distance Education, 18(1), 93-109.
Best, J. W., & Khan, J. V. (2004). Research in education (7th ed.). New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Blankenship, W. (1998). Factors related to computer use by teachers in classroom instruction (Doctorate Dissertation submitted to Virginia State University).
Breitner, M. H., & Hoppe, G. (2005). A glimpse at business models and evaluation approaches for e-learning. Heidelberg: Physica/Springer.
Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology in teaching and learning. Educause Quarterly, 1, 22-28.
Clark, T. & Berge, Z. (2005). Virtual schools and e-learning: Planning for success. Retrieved from www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/
Dibiase, D. (2000). Is distance education a fautian bargain? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(1), 130-136.
Dunn, S. L. (2000). The virtualization of education. Futurist, 34(1), 34-39.
Farahani, G. O. (2003). Existence and importance of online interaction (A Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA).
Fowler, F. (1993). Survey research methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Gulbahar, Y. (2005). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Journal of Computers and Education, 33(2), 324-366.
Haney, D. (2008). Assessing organisational readiness for e-learning. Performance Improvement, 41(2), 216-221.
Hitt, C., & Hartman, L. (2002). Distributed learning: New challenges and opportunities for institutional leadership. American Council of Education/EDUCAUSE, 25(4), 134-156.
Hjeltnes, T. A., & Hansson, B. (2005). Cost effectiveness and cost efficiency in e-learning. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 36-45.
Houtz, S., & Gupta, P. (2001). Gender roles, computer attitudes and dyadic computer interaction performance among university lecturers in Egypt. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 20(3), 1-9.
Inglis, A., Ling, P., & Loosten, V. (2000). Delivering digitally: Managing the transition to the knowledge media. London: Kogan Page.
Kariuki, J. (2006). E-learning in Kenya Universities: Random reflections about e-learning in Africa. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001419/141952e.pdf
Keller, C., & Cernerud, L. (2002). Students’ perception of e-learning in university education. Learning, Media and Technology, 27(1), 55-67.
Kihara, J. (2005). Challenges facing university education. Nairobi: Nation Media Group.
Lion, R. W., & Start, G. (2010). A Glance at institutional support for faculty teaching in an online learning environment. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33(3), 23-39.
Lu, H. P., Liu, S. H., & Liao, H. L. (2005). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning websites: An empirical study. Issues in Information System, 6(1), 190-196.
Luan, W. S., Aziz, A., Yunus, M. S. A., Sidek, Z., Bakar, K. A., Meseran, H., & Atan, H. (2005). Gender differences in ICT competencies among academicians at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(3), 62-69.
MENON Network. (2007). E-learning for innovation (HELIOS Annual Report, Helsinki).
Mercado, C. A. (2008). Readiness assessment tool for an e-learning environment implementation. Proceedings from the 5th International Conference on e-learning for Knowledge-Based Society, December 11-12, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (1999). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.
Nachmias, C. F., & Nachmias, D. (1996). Research methods in the social sciences (5th ed.). London: Arnold.
Naidu, S. (2006). E-learning: A guidebook of principles, procedures and practices. New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia.
Neil, T. (2004). Guiding principles for staff and student support. Distance Education, 13(1), 55-70.
Ngai, E. W., Poon, J. K., & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the use of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48(2), 250-267.
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Educating the net generation. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/eductingthenetgen
Omwenga, E. (2004). A model for introducing and implementing e-learning for delivery of educational content within the african context. African Journal of Sciences and Technology, 5(1), 35-48.
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37(1), 163-178.
Roberts, N., Hutchinson, W., & Little, G. (2003). Barriers to using technology for teaching and learning in Dutch universities. Educase Quarterly, 25(2), 22-28.
Romiszowski, A. (2004). Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5-27.
Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for building online learning in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saekow, A., & Samson, D. (2011). E-learning readiness of Thailand’s universities comparing to the USA’s cases. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 1(2), 554-567.
Schifter, C. C. (2000). Faculty motivators and inhibitors for participation in distance education. Educational Technology, 40(2), 43-46.
Selim, H. (2007). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of e-learning. Computers and Education, 40(1), 343-360.
Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M., Nölting, K., & Röser, M. (2004). Is e-learning the solution for individual learning? Journal of eLearning, 1(1), 1-15.
Thurab-Nkhosi, D., Lee, M., & Gachago, D. (2005). Preparing academic staff for e-learning at the University of Botswana. Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=43
Trombley, K. B., & Lee, D. (2002). Web-based learning in corporations: Who is using it and why, who is not and why not? Journal of Educational Media, 27(3), 137-146.
US Department of Education. (2000). National center for education statistics. Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology. Washington DC: NECS.
Van Braak, G. (2004). Academic staff development in online learning and teaching: Developing online pedagogies. Gold Coast: AusWeb05.
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Gender, social influence and their role in technology acceptance behaviour among academic staff in public universities, India. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
Volery, T. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 23(2), 321-334.
Wuensch, K. L. (2006). Logistic regression with SPSS. Retrieved from http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/spss/logistic.sav
Ya’acob, A. (2005). Implementation of the Malaysian smart school: An investigation of teaching-learning practices and teacher-student preparedness. Internet Journal of e-Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 16-25.