Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
customer@davidpublishing.com
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

ABSTRACT

This study examines the linguistic creativity of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in translating poetic imagery, using DeepSeek’s German translations of Li Bai’s poetry as a case study and comparing them with Alfred Forke’s translations. Drawing on the distinction between originality and effectiveness, it analyzes AI-generated translations at the lexical, grammatical, and discourse levels. The findings show that DeepSeek occasionally produces novel lexical choices, unconventional syntactic structures, and rhetorical adaptations. However, these features do not necessarily result in effective literary translation. Misinterpretations of cultural connotations, mismatches in emotional tone, and inappropriate linguistic choices often undermine the poetic meaning and aesthetic effect of the source texts. Compared with Forke’s translations, which demonstrate context-sensitive interpretation and intercultural adaptation, DeepSeek’s apparent creativity relies largely on the recombination of learned linguistic patterns rather than holistic aesthetic judgment. The study argues that AI-generated linguistic novelty should be distinguished from the intentional artistic re-creation characteristic of human literary translation. It concludes that a translator-centered model of human-AI collaboration can use AI to support translation while preserving the human translator’s role in cultural interpretation and aesthetic decision-making.

KEYWORDS

generative AI, linguistic creativity, poetic imagery, German translation, Li Bai

Cite this paper

YU Qinglu & MENG Xiaoguo. Linguistic Creativity in Generative AI Translation: German Translations of Li Bai’s Poetic Imagery. US-China Foreign Language, October 2026, Vol. 24, No. 10, 363-371 10.17265/1539-8080/2026.10.003

References

Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. Harper & Row.

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

Shao, B. (2024). The generation and understanding of everyday linguistic creativity: A case study of the use of keywords from Jin Yong’s novels on Weibo. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section), 35(4), 120-128.

Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1998). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Xiao, M. Q. (2008). “Defamiliarization”: From poetry composition to poetry translation. *Foreign Language Teaching, 2, 93-96. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2008.02.002

Zhang, X. L., & Lu, J. P. (2020). Research on linguistic creativity and its implications for language teaching. Journal of Hotan Teachers College, 39(3), 73-78.

Zhang, X., Yang, X. S., & Xu, C. S. (2023). ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence: Current status and future directions. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 37(5), 743-750.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: order@davidpublishing.com