 |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
WANG Tianhe, ZHANG Yuanzihan, Iat Meng Chan
Full-Text PDF
XML 141 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2185/2026.05.002
City University of Macau, Macau, China
Climate change and carbon transition policies are reshaping the strategic landscape for logistics firms. Although earlier work looked at green logistics practices and environmental performance, less is understood about how climate pressure can turn into a genuine competitive edge. This paper investigates how capabilities get reconfigured when logistics companies face climate related pressures, within China logistics industry. Using institutional theory, dynamic capabilities, and the natural resource-based view, the study takes a qualitative multi case path. It leans on semi structured interviews with logistics managers, sustainability professionals, and industry experts, and there is a sense that all of them bring different angles. The materials will be worked on via thematic coding and a cross-case comparison, to build a process model that links climate pressure, managerial sensemaking, capability reconfiguration, stakeholder alignment, and competitive advantage. In terms of contributions, the study adds to sustainable supply chain research and strategic management literature by clarifying how environmental constraints may stimulate strategic renewal. For practice, it gives logistics firms a clearer direction when they want to go past basic compliance and develop green competitiveness.
climate pressure, capability reconfiguration, green competitive advantage
WANG Tianhe, ZHANG Yuanzihan, Iat Meng Chan. (2026). From Climate Pressure to Competitive Advantage: Unpacking Capability Reconfiguration Mechanisms in China’s Logistics Industry. Management Studies, Vol. 14, No. 5, 265-274. doi: 10.17265/2328-2185/2026.05.002.
Adeoye-Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews. JACCP Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(10), 1358-1367. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441
Alotaibi, E. M., Khallaf, A., Abdallah, A. A., Zoubi, T., & Alnesafi, A. (2024). Blockchain-driven carbon accountability in supply chains. Sustainability, 16(24), 10872. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410872
Bleady, A., Ali, A. H., & Ibrahim, S. B. (2018). Dynamic capabilities theory: Pinning down a shifting concept. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(2), 1-16. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Dynamic-Capabilities-Theory-Pinning-Down-a-Shifting-Concept-1528-2635-22-2-197.pdf
Branzei, O., Ursacki‐Bryant, T. J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. (2004). The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11), 1075-1095. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.409
Butt, A. S. (2025). Strategies to combat climate change challenges in sustainable supply chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(5), 5283-5298. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4246
Calza, F., Parmentola, A., & Tutore, I. (2017). Types of green innovations: Ways of implementation in a non-green industry. Sustainability, 9(8), 1301. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081301
Cruzes, D. S., Dybå, T., Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2014). Case studies synthesis: A thematic, cross-case, and narrative synthesis worked example. Empirical Software Engineering, 20(6), 1634-1665. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-014-9326-8
De Souza Barbosa, A., Da Silva, M. C. B. C., Da Silva, L. B., Morioka, S. N., & De Souza, V. F. (2023). Integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria: Their impacts on corporate sustainability performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 410. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01919-0
Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2019). Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 847-857. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2286
Dey, A., LaGuardia, P., & Srinivasan, M. (2011). Building sustainability in logistics operations: a research agenda. Management Research Review, 34(11), 1237-1259. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111178774
Garcia, D., & Gluesing, J. C. (2013). Qualitative research methods in international organizational change research. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(2), 423-444. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811311328416
Halim, R., Kirstein, L., Merk, O., & Martinez, L. (2018). Decarbonization pathways for international maritime transport: A model-based policy impact assessment. Sustainability, 10(7), 2243. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072243
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2010). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464-1479. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Hu, Q., Hart, P., & Cooke, D. (2007). The role of external and internal
influences on information systems security—A neo-institutional perspective. The
Journal of Strategic Information Systems,
16(2), 153-172. Retrieved
from https://doi.org/10.10
16/j.jsis.2007.05.004
Kabongo, J. D., & Boiral, O. (2017). Doing more with less: Building dynamic capabilities for eco-efficiency. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 956-971. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1958
Luisi, F., & Cucaro, O. M. S. (2026). Talking the walk: ESG discourse as strategic dynamic capability. Business Strategy and the Environment. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71266
Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 291-335. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1014661
Nagy, G., & Szentesi, S. (2024). Green logistics: Transforming supply chains for a sustainable future. Advanced Logistic Systems—Theory and Practice, 18(3), 29-42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32971/als.2024.026
Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90-99. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: The role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45-63. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2010.03189.x
Salvato, C., & Vassolo, R. (2017). The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1728-1752. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2703
Schenzle, L., & Busch, T. (2025). Navigating the net zero transition: Towards improved effectiveness of corporate decarbonization strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(3), 3774-3789. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70358
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199808)19:8
Sun, L., & Zeng, J. (2026). Big data-driven carbon footprint tracking and game-theoretic incentive design in green logistics supply chains. Asian Journal of Water Environment and Pollution, 23(3), 026040017. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.36922/ajwep026040017
Tetteh, F. K., Kwateng, K. O., Tukue, T., & Mensah, J. (2025). Green supply chain management practices: Review, framework and future research directions. Journal of Responsible Production and Consumption, 2(1), 112-150. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/jrpc-08-2024-0039
Tunca, S., Kelten, Z. K., & Balcioglu, Y. S. (2026). Optimizing carbon footprint reduction ın supply chains through blockchain enabled transparency and business analytics for high emission industries. Discover Sustainability, 7(1), Article 867. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03050-x
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Wang, Y., Guo, M., Ye, L., & Li, Q. (2025). Sensemaking in action: A multi-case study on the formation mechanism of high reliability teams in Chinese organizational contexts. Acta Psychologica, 262, 106048. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106048
Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2016). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93-113. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2589
Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Liu, X., & Tang, X. (2023). Effect of the logistics industry on the promotion of China’s position in the global value chain: An international trade perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 86, 834-847. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.03.029