 |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The INAPP Dispositive for the Formative and Authentic Assessment of Key Competences in IVET
Andrea Giacomantonio, Fabrizio Giovannini, Marta Santanicchia
Full-Text PDF
XML 683 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-623X/2024.10.001
Pegaso Telematic University, Naples, Italy; National Institute for Public Policies Analysis (INAPP), Roma, Italy
In Italy, significant progress has been made in the lifelong learning strategy. However, regarding key competences, the policies and related technical-methodological frameworks do not yet provide sufficient and homogeneous references to training designers, neither to teachers and trainers. INAPP carried out (2018-2023) a research aimed at designing and testing a dispositive for the formative and authentic assessment of four key competences in the IVET System (EU Recommendation 2018): personal, social, and learning to learn; citizenship; entrepreneurship; cultural awareness and expression. This contribution presents the conceptual basis and design of the assessment dispositive at the conclusion of its testing, which involved over 50 training institutions in 15 Italian Regions. The testing has provided promising indications that seem to confirm the formative capacity of the dispositive and the informative potential of the reality-based assessment tool (reality tasks) to discern different levels of mastery among students and adopt appropriate teaching-learning strategies.
lifelong learning strategy, key competences, formative assessment, IVET system, reality task
Andrea Giacomantonio, Fabrizio Giovannini, Marta Santanicchia. (2024). The INAPP Dispositive for the Formative and Authentic Assessment of Key Competences in IVET. US-China Education Review A, October 2024, Vol. 14, No. 10, 615-625.
Agamben, G. (2009). What is an apparatus? And other essays. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bloom, H. (1994). The Western Canon. The books and school if the ages. Troy: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Bonazza, V., & Giacomantonio, A. (2023). Strategic competences and academic success. Linearity and profiles. In V. Bonazza (Ed.), The Hephaestus’ mark: Hypotheses, models and evidence about competence-based teaching and learning (pp. 61-93). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditations pascaliennes. Éditions du Seuil.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria (VA): ASCD.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the know. Boston: The Beacon Press.
Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1976). La volonté de savoir. Histoire de la sexualité 1. Paris: Gallimard.
Giovannini, F., & Santanicchia, M. (Eds.). (2023). Valutare competenze chiave nella IeFP. Fondamenti e sperimentazione di un dispositivo di valutazione formativa. Palo Alto: INAPP.
Greene J. C. (2009). Meaningfully engaging with differences through mixed methods educational evaluation. In K. E. Ryan and J. B. Cousin (Eds.), The SAGE international handbook of educational evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Grządziel, D. (2024). Character education: Developing moral identity through narrativity and reflection. Dialogues in Education, 1, 1-12.
Morin, E. (1999). Une tête bien faite: Repenser la réforme, réformer la pensée. Le Seuil.
Morin, E. (2000). Les Sept Savoirs nécessaires à l'éducation du future. Le Seuil.
Morreale, S., & Ferri, V. (2022). The work atlas, the green transition and changing occupations and skills. Speech at “PES Network Stakeholder Conference 2022”. Retrieved April 7, 2022 from https://oa.inapp.org/xmlui/handle/20.500.12916/3484
Pellerey, M. (1996). Questionario sulle strategie di apprendimento (QSA). Roma: LAS.
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., & Friedman, T. (2018a). Becoming citizens in a changing world. IEA international civic and citizenship education study 2016, international report. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Schulz, W., Carstens, R., Losito, B., & Fraillon, J. (2018b). ICCS 2016 technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Tenam-Zemach, M., & Flynn, J. E. Jr. (2015). Rubric nation. Critical inquiries on the impact of rubrics in education. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance. Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.