Contact us
![]() |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Sokha Thim1,3,Solida Keo1, Kannan Dim1, Kroesna Kang1, Sath Keo1, Vutey Venn2 and Kouch Theng1
Full-Text PDF
XML 774 Views
DOI:10.17265/2162-5263/2024.02.003
Affiliation(s)
1.Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh 12400, Cambodia
2. General Directorate of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh 120603, Cambodia
3. Graduate School, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh 12400, Cambodia
ABSTRACT
The experiment was conducted at Veterinary Research Station of Faculty
of Veterinary Medicine, Royal University of Agriculture. The experimental
period lasted 60 days, starting from October 1st to November 30th 2022. CRD
(Completely Randomized Design) was used with 2 treatments/groups, vaccination
group and non-vaccination group “control”, and 6 replications. The vaccination
groups received two times of vaccination by dropping into the ocular at 7 days
and 21 days. Meanwhile, blood samples were collected 3 times to detect the antibody level of ND
(Newcastle Disease) and contained 21 days
old, 35 days old and 49 days old chicks. The ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent
Assay) was performed to detect the antibody of those 2 groups. The result of
finding showed that the S/P (Sample to Positive) ratio of control at 21 days, was very low, even in
3rd quartile, which was below the threshold. However,
the vaccination group was relatively high, even in 1st quartile, which was
higher than the threshold.At 35 days, S/P ratio of control group was
still very low, but a bit higher than at 21 days. Meanwhile, the vaccination group
was still high, even in 1st quartile, and two-time higher than at 21 days, but
an increasing number of
samples developed less antibody than threshold, accounting for 12.22%. At 49 days, the control group was still very low, even in
3rd quartile, but a bit higher than at 21 days and 35 days, and was close to
the threshold. The vaccination group was still relatively high,
even in 1st quartile but lower than three times comparing to 35 days. However,
in this age, the number of
chickens that developed antibody seemed to be increased in the control group, vice versa for vaccination group. The average S/P ratio was different significant (p<
0.001), where vaccination had higher S/P ratio than control. It was similar
finding for log-titer, the vaccination had higher figure (p<0.001). The risk of infection of ND was higher in control
group, but it will reduce by increasing the age of chicken, while vaccination
group was decreased by increasing age, especially at 49 days and we need to
consider another vaccination to get full protection.
KEYWORDS
Antibody, vaccination, control, ND, S/P ratio.
Cite this paper
References