Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Hungry and Angry Society: Implications for Sustainable Development in Nigeria
Author(s)
Lawrence Udisi
Full-Text PDF
XML 496 Views
DOI:10.17265/2160-6579/2024.02.008
Affiliation(s)
Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Nigeria
ABSTRACT
Hunger is a physiological
need, but the production and consumption of adequate and balanced food is a
function of social forces. At every point, social, political, and economic
processes intervene, for better or (more common) for worse. Food is one
fundamental need of human beings for survival. But in Nigeria there is
widespread food shortage and hunger. Development scholars have put forward
reasons why poverty, hunger persists in the country, from the platitudes about
population growth, inadequate implementation of agricultural policies, and
neglect of agriculture, bad leadership, corruption, and the issue of
distribution. Nigeria is richly blessed with arable land and citizens eager to
unlock its food potentials. Unfortunately, this is far from being realized as
the country depends on foreign countries for food, a situation that is tragic
and sad. She spends about $10 billion a year importing food and agricultural
products, the majority of which are wheat, rice, poultry, fish, and
consumer-oriented foods. The pressure on the exchange rate results in
devaluation-triggered inflation and food costs that fly up beyond the grasp of
people at the bottom of the ladder as it is now is one of the negative
repercussions of high food importation bills. Examining the effects of hunger
is one of this paper’s key concerns and goals, and anger crisis for achieving
sustainable development in the country using the Frustration-Aggression Theory,
The Relative Deprivation and Political Economy Approach as guide.
KEYWORDS
hunger and angry society, poverty, sustainable development, frustration-aggression theory, political economy
Cite this paper
References