Restrictive Relative Clauses in Zahrani Spoken Arabic: A Minimalist Approach

This paper offers a thorough description of restrictive relative clauses in Zahrani Spoken Arabic (henceforth ZSA). It also provides a transformational analysis within Minimalist syntax. Restrictive relatives are classified into two types: definite relatives and indefinite relatives. The former type is initiated by the relativizer illi: “that” and modifies a definite antecedent/head noun, and the latter modifies an indefinite antecedent and lacks the relativizer illi: Two relativization strategies are available for ZSA restrictive relative clauses. The first strategy is the employment of resumptive clitics or pronouns, and the second one relates to the utilization of gaps. There is an alternation between the resumptive strategy and the gap strategy in subject and direct object positions. The optional use of gaps in direct object position is only possible when the relativized noun is definite. However, only the resumptive clitic is utilized in other positions (indirect object, prepositional object, and possessor position). In non-island contexts, both relative clauses involving gaps or resumptive clitics are accounted for by an empty operator movement. In island contexts, the null operator movement is not assumed.

Abu-Chacra, F. (2007). Arabic: An essential grammar. New York: Routledge.

Alexiadou, A., Law, P., Meinunger, A., & Wilder, C. (Eds.). (2000). The syntax of relative clauses. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Alhawary, M. (2011). Modern standard Arabic grammar: A learner’s guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Aljawjari, M. (2004). ŠarH Šuðuur ð-ðahab liljawjari. N. Alharthi, (Ed.). AlMadinah: Islamic University.

Alnadri, M. (1997). NaHw l-luGati l-ʕarabiyyah. Beirut: Ɂalmaktabah l-ʕaSriyyah.

Alnuqrat, A. (2003). ɁaŠ-Šaamil fii l-luGati l-ʕarabiyyah. Bin Gazi, Lybia: Dar Qutaybah.

Alqurashi, A. (2013). Arabic free and restrictive relatives: A minimalist and an HPSG approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).

AlQurashi, I. (2013). Nominal phrases in modern standard Arabic: Minimalist and HPSG approaches (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).

Alsamorrai, F. (2003a). Maʕaanii n-naHw (Vol. I). Cairo: Alʕaatik Publishing Press.

Alsamorrai, F. (2003b). Maʕaanii n-naHw (Vol. III). Cairo: Alʕaatik Publishing Press.

Alsayed, A. (1998). A government-binding approach to restrictive relatives, with particular reference to restrictive relatives in standard Arabic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).

Ali, A. (2004). Agreement in relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure: A study of standard Arabic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bangor University)

Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Choueiri, L. (2010). The syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Aoun, J., & Choueiri, L. (1997). Resumption and last resort (Ms., University of Southern California, Los Angeles).

Aoun, J., Choueiri, L., & Hornstein, N. (2001). Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 371-403.

Aoun, J., & Li, Y. A. (2003). Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Arnold, D. (2004). Non-restrictive relative clauses in construction based HPSG. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 27-47). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Arnold, D. J. (2007). Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics, 43(2), 272-309. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004586

Bardeas, S. (2009). The syntax of the Arabic DP (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of York). 

Bianchi, V. (1999). Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bianchi, V. (2000). The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(1), 123-140.

Bianchi, V. (2002a). Headed relative clauses in generative syntax—Part I. Glot International, 6(7), 197-204.

Bianchi, V. (2002b). Headed relative clauses in generative syntax—Part II. Glot International, 6(8), 1-13.

Borsley, R. D. (1992). More on the difference between English restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 139-148. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015024

Borsley, R. D. (1997). Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(4), 629-647.

Borsley, R. D. (2010). An HPSG approach to Welsh unbounded dependencies. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG10 Conference (pp. 47-67). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Browning, M. (1987). Null operator constructions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT).

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71-132). New York: Academic Press.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1-52): Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland and H. M. Gaertner (Eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from semantics (pp. 1-29). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, and M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133-166). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Choueiri, L. (2002). Issues in the syntax of resumption: Restrictive relatives in Lebanese Arabic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles).

De Vries, M. (2002). The syntax of relativization. Utrecht: Lot.

De Vries, M. (2006). The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives, and promotion. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(2), 229-270. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.2.229

Engdahl, E. (1983). Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6(1), 5-34.

Engdahl, E. (1985). Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions. Linguistics, 23(1), 3-44.

Fabb, N. (1990). The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 26(1), 57-78.

Fassi Fehri, A. (1993). Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Galal, M. M. (2004). A minimalist approach to relative clauses in modern standard Arabic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas).

Hasan, A. (1999a). An-naHw Alwaafi (Vol. I). Cairo: Daar Alma’aarif.

Hasan, A. (1999b). An-naHw Alwaafi (Vol. III). Cairo: Daar Alma’aarif.

Holes, C. (1995). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions and varieties. London: Longman.

Ibn Malik, B. (2000). ŠarH Ibn AnnaZim ʕalaa Ɂalfiyyati Ibni Malik. M. Uyuun Assuud, (Ed.). Beirut: Dar Alkutub Alʕilmiyyah.

Jackendoff, R. (1977). X’- syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63-99.

Kremers, J. (2003). The Arabic noun phrase. A minimalist approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen). 

Lees, R. (1960). The grammar of English nominalizations. The Hague: Mounton.

Lees, R. (1961). The constituent structure of noun phrases. American Speech, 36, 159-168.

Mohammad, M. (1989). The sentence structure of Arabic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles).

Ouhalla, J. (1988). The syntax of head movement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College London).

Ouhalla, J. (2004). Semitic relatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(2), 288-300.

Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT).

Ryding, K. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Safir, K. (1986). Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(4), 663-689.

Schachter, P. (1973). Focus and relativization. Language, 49(1), 19-46.

Schulz, E. (2004). A student grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sibawayh, A. (1988). Kitaab Sibawayh. A. Haroun, (Ed.). Cairo: Maktabat l-khanji.

Suaieh, S. (1980). Aspects of Arabic relative clauses: A study of the structure of relative clauses in modern written Arabic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).

Taghvaipour, M. A. (2004). An HPSG analysis of Persian relative clauses. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (pp. 274-293). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Van Gelderen, E. (2009). Renewal in the left periphery: Economy and the complementiser layer. Transactions of the Philological Society, 107(2), 131-195.

Vergnaud, J. R. (1974). French relative clauses (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT).

Zaborski, A. (2006). Article, definite. In K. Versteegh, M. Eid, A. Elgibali, M. Woidich, and A. Zaborski (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (Vol. I, pp. 187-188). Leiden: Brill.