Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

ABSTRACT

This paper asks whether the turbulence of the Covid-19 lockdowns has left enduring changes to everyday life in the UK which are unlikely to have happened, up to now, in the absence of the pandemic. The analysis disaggregates the UK population by gender, and into age groups and income bands, specifies whose lives were changed during the lockdowns, and exactly how. It is argued that most changes from pre- to post-lockdowns have been spurts in longer-running trends driven by the UK demographic, housing, economic and political contexts. The exceptions, the sole genuine lockdown legacies that the analysis leaves, are the normalisation of working from home and an increase in total time spent doing paid work.

KEYWORDS

age differences, Covid-19 pandemic, gender differences, income bands, leisure, lockdowns

Cite this paper

Ken Roberts. Have the Covid-19 Lockdowns Made Lasting Changes to Everyday Life? Evidence from UK Time Use Surveys. Sociology Study, July-Aug. 2023, Vol. 13, No. 4, 175-187

References

Bell, T (2020). The myths of both left and right stop us seeing the true story of inequality. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/08/inequality-myths-left-right-stop-us-seeing-true-story

Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (1999). The rush hour: The quality of leisure time and gender equity. SPRC Discussion Paper No. 97, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Bristow, J. (2016). The making of ‘Boomergeddon’: The construction of the Baby Boomer generation as a social problem in Britain. British Journal of Sociology, 67(4), 575-591.

British Broadcasting Corporation, Audience Research Department. (1978). The people’s activities and the use of time. British Broadcasting Corporation, London.

Carpentieri, J. D., Goodman, A., Parsons, S., Patalay, P., & Swain, J. (2017). Lifetime poverty and attitudes to retirement among a cohort born in 1958. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University College, London.

Cominetti, N., McCurdy, C., Thwaites, G., & Vieira-Marques, R. (2023). Low pay Britain 2023. Resolution Foundation, London.

Connolly, S., & Gregory, M. (2010). Dual tracks: Part-time work in life-cycle employment for British women. Journal of Population Economics, 23(3), 907-931.

Corlett, A., & Try, L. (2022). The living standards outlook 2022. Resolution Foundation, London.

Corlett, A., Odamtten, F., & Try, L. (2022). The living standards audit. Resolution Foundation, London.

Cribb, J., Emmerson, C., Johnson, P., Karjalainen, H., & O’Brien, L. (2023). Challenges for the UK pension system: The case for a pensions review. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

Donald, I., & Canter, D. (1992). Intentionality and fatality during the King’s Cross underground fire. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(3), 203-218.

Geraci, A., Nardotto, M., Reggiani, T., & Sabatini, F. (2022). Broadband Internet and social capital. Journal of Public Economics, 206(3), 104578.

Gershuny, J. I., & Thomas, G. S. (1980). Changing patterns of time use: UK activity patterns 1961 and 1975. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton.

Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (2019). What we really do all day: Insights from the Centre for Time Use Research. London: Pelican.

Henehan, K., & Judge, L. (2020). Home and away: The UK labour market in a post-Brexit world. Resolution Foundation, London.

Henz, U., & Mills, C. (2018). Social class origin and assortative mating in Britain, 1949-2010. Sociology, 52(6), 1217-1236.

Hobsbawm, J. (2022). The nowhere office: Reinventing work and the workplace of the future. London: Basic books.

Jenkins, S. P. (2015). The income distribution in the UK: A picture of advantage and disadvantage. ISER Working Paper No. 2015-01, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester.

Lanning, T., Bradley, L., Darlington, R., & Gottfried, G. (2013). Great expectations: Exploring the promises of gender equality. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.

Lashua, B., Johnson, C. W., & Parry, D. C. (Eds.). (2021). Leisure in the time of coronavirus: A rapid response special issue. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2), 6-11.

Lee, I., & Tipoe, E. (2021). Changes in the quantity and quality of time use during the COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK: Who is the most affected? PLOS ONE, 16(11), e0258917.

Leslie, J., & Shah, K. (2021). (Wealth) gap year: The impact of the coronavirus crisis on UK household wealth. Resolution Foundation, London.

Leslie, J., & Shah, K. (2022). Intergenerational rapport fair? Resolution Foundation, London.

McCulloch, A. (2014). Cohort variations in the membership of voluntary associations in Great Britain, 1991-2007. Sociology, 48(1), 167-185.

Murphy, L. (2022). Constrained choices: Understanding the prevalence of part-time work among low-paid workers in the UK. Resolution Foundation, London.

Murphy, L., & Thwaites, G. (2023). Post-pandemic participation: Exploring labour force participation in the UK, from the Covid-19 pandemic to the decade ahead. Resolution Foundation, London.

Office for National Statistics. (2017). Migration since the Brexit vote: What’s changed in six charts. Office for National Statistics, London.

Office for National Statistics. (2020a). Coronavirus and how people spent their time under lockdown: 28 March to 26 April 2020. Office for National Statistics, London.

Office for National Statistics. (2020b). A “new normal”? How people spent their time after the March 2020 coronavirus lockdown. Office for National Statistics, London.

Office for National Statistics. (2021). How people with a vaccine spent their time—One year on from the first UK lockdown: Great Britain, March 2021. Office for National Statistics, London.

Office for National Statistics. (2022a). How people spent their time after coronavirus restrictions were lifted, UK: March 2022. Office for National Statistics, London.

Office for National Statistics. (2022b). Is hybrid working here to stay? Office for National Statistics, London.

Pensions Policy Institute. (2021). Pension facts. Pension Policy Institute, London.

Roberts, K. (2006). Leisure in contemporary society (2nd ed.). Wallingford: CABI.

Roberts, K. (2012). The end of the long baby-boomer generation. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(4), 479-497.

Roberts, K. (2023a). Time use, work and leisure in the UK before, during, between and following the Covid-19 lockdowns. Leisure Studies, 42(1), 56-68.

Roberts, K. (2023b). Irreplaceable but limited: The value of large-scale time use surveys in leisure studies. The case of differences in time use by sex, age and income from before to after the Covid-19 lockdowns in the UK. Advances in Applied Sociology, 13(7), 513-530.

Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. Penn State: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Segal, L. (1997). Slow motion: Changing masculinities, changing men. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sullivan, O. (2000). The division of domestic labour: Twenty years of change. Sociology, 34(3), 437-456.

Teodorovicz, T., Sadun, R., Kun, A. L., & Shaer, O. (2022). How does working from home during Covid-19 affect what managers do? Evidence from time-use studies. Discussion Paper No. 1844, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London.

Wearing, B. (1996). Grandmotherhood as leisure? World Leisure and Recreation, 38(4), 15-19.

Wolf, M. (2023). The crisis of democratic capitalism. London: Allen Lane.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]