![]() |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
A Comparative Study of the Dutch Piramide Curriculum and the American Tools of the Mind Curriculum
FANG Mengyan, WANG Mingzhu, ZHANG Mengluan
Full-Text PDF
XML 795 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-6248/2023.02.005
Jilin International Studies University, Changchun, China
With the continuous deepening of the reform of preschool education curriculums, some high-quality preschool curriculums stand out. The Piramide curriculum in the Netherlands and the Mind of the Tools curriculum in the United States are two high-profile preschool education curriculums. Although these two curriculums are widely used, their differences and similarities must be further studied. This study explores the similarities and differences between the Piramide and Tools of the Mind curriculums. It was found that the two curriculums have similarities in curriculum theory, teaching form, and teaching strategy. There are differences in curriculum theory, teaching process, curriculum objectives, curriculum evaluation, and home education. This study provides a new reference for developing the Chinese preschool curriculum through the comparative study of these two kinds of curriculum.
Piramide curriculum, Mind of the Tools curriculum, comparative study
FANG Mengyan, WANG Mingzhu, ZHANG Mengluan. (2023). A Comparative Study of the Dutch Piramide Curriculum and the American Tools of the Mind Curriculum. US-China Education Review B, Mar.-Apr. 2023, Vol. 13, No. 2, 117-121.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2019). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian-based early childhood program. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(3), 223-237. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.17.3.223
Cao, Y. H., & Liang, Y. (2010). The Netherlands “Pyramid Teaching Method” and its enlightenment to kindergarten teaching in my country. Guide to Early Childhood Education (Teacher Edition) Second Half Month, (6). Retrieved from https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/QK201004424929
Dong, H. G., & Wu, H. (2019). Mental tool curriculum and its reference to promoting the development of children’s self-management ability in my country. Early Education (Educational Research), 37(3), 8-12.
Fleer, M., & Van Oers, B. (Eds.). (2017). International handbook of early childhood education. New York: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0927-7
Goble, P., Flynn, T., Nauman, C., Almendarez, P., & Linstrom, M. (2021). Intervention implementation of tools of the mind for preschool children’s executive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 624140. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624140
Hou, Y. C. (2018). A case study of American preschool education projects—Based on the analysis of psychological tools curriculum. Journal of World Education, 31(2), 41-51.
Hu, Y. L. (2016). Review of pyramid teaching method in the Netherlands. Journal of Mudanjiang University, 25(11), 132-134. doi:10.15907/j.cnki.23-1450.2016.11.044
Ke, Z. L. (2007). Psychological tools: A social and cultural study of education. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
Muhonen, H., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. M., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2016). Scaffolding through dialogic teaching in early school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 143-154. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.007
Selda, A. R. A. S. (2015). Promoting self-regulation in early years: Tools of the mind. Journal of Education and Future, (8), 15-25. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/jef/issue/18640/196739
Solomon, T., Plamondon, A., O’Hara, A., Finch, H., Goco, G., Chaban, P., ... Tannock, R. (2018). A cluster randomized-controlled trial of the impact of the tools of the mind curriculum on self-regulation in Canadian preschoolers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2366. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02366
Zhong, H. Y. (2021). The curriculum path of symbolic games—The experience and inspiration of the American “Mental Tools” intervention project. Education Approach, 42(4), 56-62.



