Alternative Agricultural Ditch Designs, NO3-N Treatment, Construction Costs, and Benefits—Mower County, Minnesota, USA
Author(s)
Lori Krider2, Geoff Kramer2, Bruce Wilson1, Joseph Magner1, William Lazarus3, Brad Hansen4 and John Nieber1
Full-Text PDF
XML 478 Views
DOI:10.17265/2162-5263/2022.06.002
Affiliation(s)
1. Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, (BBE) University of Minnesota (UMN), St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
2. Former graduate students at BBE-UMN
3. Department of Applied Economics, University of MN, St. Paul, MN, 55106, USA
4. Retired Scientist – BBE-UMN
ABSTRACT
The Minnesota Nutrient Management Strategy has identified waters with
the highest amounts of nutrients that could potentially enter the Mississippi
River. Mower County contains the headwaters of the Cedar River Basin, a large
nutrient loading basin in the upper Mississippi River Basin. Joint efforts of
the UMN (University of Minnesota), the Nature Conservancy, and Mower County, MN
implemented alternative agricultural ditch designs to improve water management.
Designs consisted of a TSD (Two-Stage Ditch), a rock trench, a rock inlet, and
two in-ditch linear treatment systems. These features were implemented to
increase ditch stability and to reduce the loading of sediment and nutrients.
Important costs were the
possible removal of productive ag-land, construction costs, and the break-even
discount (interest) rates. Benefits included lower maintenance cost, reduced
sediment and phosphorus loads with more stable ditches, and enhanced removal of
NO3-N (Nitrate-Nitrogen). Results suggest costs of the TSD
construction may be supplemented with subsidies to break-even with conventional
ditch design costs. Subsidies based on NO3-N removal show the TSD
compares well to other NO3-N best management practices. The break-even NO3-N removal costs vary greatly but are lowest when
the floodplain bench is inundated for longer time periods and when the discount
rate, cleanout interval of the conventional design, and construction costs of
the TSD are low.
KEYWORDS
Ag-drainage-best
management practices, economic analysis, NO3-N removal.
Cite this paper
References