![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Optimal Rendezvous Sequence for LEO Debris Capture
Ciro Borriello and Lorenzo Casalino
Full-Text PDF
XML 2014 Views
DOI:10.17265/2332-8258/2015.01.004
The primary purpose of this study is to exploit the effect of Earth’s non-sphericity perturbation, particularly due to the J2 term, in order to optimize the capture sequence of potential orbital debris, that is the cumulative ΔV associated to the transfers between one object and the others. As results of several researches and model predictions, many international agencies agree that the growing population of objects and debris in LEO (low earth orbits), will follow a diverging trend in the future. This, in turn, would constitute a serious threat to circum-terrestrial space safety and sustainability. In LEO, the J2 disturbance is prevailing over the others, and it acts by affecting the longitude of the ascending node (Ω), the argument of perigee (ω) and, accordingly, the true anomaly (ν). Therefore, the goal of optimizing the ΔV is achieved by taking advantage of the rate of variation of Ω and ω, thereby compensating for the ΔΩ and Δω, present between the orbital transfer vehicle (chaser) and the debris to be captured (target). Obviously, the perturbation will lead to favourable variations of the orbital parameters only for some combinations of Ω and ω. Yet the presence of a debris population with random distribution of Ω and ω, makes this application particularly suited to the problem. The single maneuver has been modelled with a 4-impulse time fixed rendezvous and the optimization problem has been addressed by implementing a hybrid evolutionary algorithm, which adopts, in parallel, three different strategies, namely, genetic algorithm, differential evolution and particle swarm optimization.
Trajectory optimization, hybrid evolutionary algorithms, debris removal, multi-target rendezvous, J2 perturbation assist.
[1] UN. 1999. Scientific and Technical Subcommittee of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful uses of Outer Space. Technical report on space debris, New York.
[2] NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), 2008. Handbook for Limiting Orbital Debris. Washington D.C.: NASA.
[3] Kessler, D. J., Johnson, N. L., Liou, J. C., and Matney, M. 2010. “The Kessler Syndrome: Implications to Future Space Operations.” 33rd Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference, Breckenridge, Colorado.
[4] Liou, J. C., Johnson, N. L., and Hill, N. M. 2010. “Controlling the Growth of Future LEO Debris Population with Active Debris Removal.” Acta Astronautica 66 (5-6): 648-53.
[5] Liou, J. C., Hall, D. T., Krisko, P. H., and Opiela, J. N. 2004. “LEGEND, a 3-Dimensional LEO to GEO Debris Evolutionary Model.” Adv. Space Res.
[6] Sentinella, M. R. 2008. “Development of New Procedures and Hybrid Algorithms for Space Trajectory Optimization.” Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Torino.
[7] Sentinella, M. R., Casalino, L. 2009. “Cooperative Evolutionary Algorithm for Space Trajectory Optimization.” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Journal, 105: 211-27.
[8] NORAD, 2012, Two-Line Element Sets, accessed October 2012, http://clestrak.com/.
[9] Barbee, B. W., Davies, G. W., Hur-Diaz, S. 2009. “Spacecraft Trajectory Design for Tours of Multiple Small Bodies.” AAS (Advances in the Astronautical Sciences), 135: 2169-88.