![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
WANG Ruozhou
Full-Text PDF
XML 542 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5542/2022.04.008
East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
As new media communication becomes popular and the technological threshold of personal expression has been lowered, the phenomenon of online rumors has also emerged with new communication characteristics as individuals are continuously empowered to communicate. This paper quantifies a rumor spreading event from 2020 to 2021 that generated a lot of discussion. Using a content analysis approach, we examined how different subjects in the online public opinion chaos have influenced the spreading process of the event, and used the study of online rumor spreading mechanism to gain insight into the public opinion governance in the new media era. The study found that media platforms, the parties involved, and the general public as important participants have fully utilized the voice channel of the online communication platform to play a role behind the rumor event.
new media, technology empowerment, online rumors, rumor-spreading mechanism
Psychology Research, April 2022, Vol. 12, No. 4, 208-217
Allport. (2003). Rumor psychology. (J. P. Liu, Y. Y. Liang, & L. Huang, Trans.). Shenyang: Liaoning Education Publishing Press.
Chao, N., & Huang, X. (2004). Research on the phenomenon of “rumors” in Internet communication. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 27(6), 586-590.
Dai, S. F., & Wang, Y. (2011). A Preliminary Study on the Causes and Countermeasures of Network Rumors -- Communication Interpretation of “March 16” Salt Snatch Event. Journalism and Mass Communication Monthly, (04), 11-12+29.
Ding, W. (2009). New media and empowerment: A practical social research. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, (10), 76-81.
Jiang, F. (2011). “Cyber violence”: Concepts, root causes and their responses: An analytical perspective based on risk society. Zhejiang Journal, (6), 181-187.
Kapferer. (1991). Rumeurs: Le plus vieux media du monde. (R. L. Zheng & Q. Bian, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai People Press.
Le Bon, G. (2018). The crowd: Group psychology. (Q. Dong, Trans.). Hangzhou: Zhejiang Literature and Art Press.
Li, Z. (2010). Characteristics of rumor propagation and its hazards in the Internet era. People’s Forum, (2), 86-87.
Liu, P. (2020). “The whole world is talking”: Research on user generated journalism cases via digital media during the COVID-19 epidemic. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 42(9), 62-84.
Peng, L. (2014). The mob wisdom or mass lost: Observation on both sides of the Internet community interaction effect. Contemporary Communication, (2), 4-7.
Tang, X. M., & Lai, S. Q. (2018). Study on Denying Rumors Strategy in Unexpected Events—The Case of “Taifu Middle School”. Journal of Intelligence, 37(09), 95-99.
Tian, S. (2021). Rumor propagation and governance of the “Shuanghuanglian incident” in the context of social governance. Journalism Research Guide, 12(1), 23-25.
Yan, G., & Li, N. (2020). Moral anomie in public network expression and its governance. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology (Social Science), 22(2), 131-144.
Yuan, H., & Xie, G. (2015). Research on the rumor mongers of public event online rumors—Content analysis based on 118 influential public event online rumors. Journalists, (5), 58-65.
Zhang, N., & Zhao, Y. (2015). The spread and governance of online rumors in the context of risk society. China Higher Education, (10), 47-49.
Zhu, G. (2002). The governmental process in contemporary China. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Press.