![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Non-serious Teasing in Multi-Party Face-to-Face Interactions
WEI Jiahuan, ZENG Xianghong
Full-Text PDF
XML 483 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8080/2021.12.002
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Teasing, a vehicle usually accomplished through denigrating or ridiculing others, has been the object of a considerable amount of research. In this paper, we tend to delve into two non-serious teasing, specifically, jocular mockery and jocular flattery: One occurs through diminishing something of relevance and the other occurs by elevating others. This paper adopts the methodology of conversational analysis from pragmatics, aiming to disclose how these two forms of non-serious teasing are interactionally accomplished. The current study focuses on the context of multi-party face-to-face interactions in two renowned Chinese reality shows, in a bid to contribute to the current teasing research across various sociocultural contexts. The main concerns of the research are mainly around three respects: what occasions jocular mockery and jocular flattery respectively; what are the similarities and differences of these two forms; what functions can these two kinds achieve.
non-serious teasing, jocular flattery, jocular mockery, reality shows
Haugh, M. (2010). Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2106-2119.
Haugh, M. (2014). Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76-99.
Haugh, M. (2017). Mockery and (non-)seriousness in initial interactions amongst American and Australian speakers of English. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Handbook of communication in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 104-118). New York: Routledge.
Partington, A. (2008). Teasing at the White House: A corpus-assisted study of face work in performing and responding to teases. Text Talk, 28(6), 771-772.