 |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
SUN Han
Full-Text PDF
XML 725 Views
DOI:10.17265//1539-8072/2021.12.006
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
This study combs through the frequently cited papers on L2 pragmatic competence of Chinese tertiary-level students from CNKI, and analyzes the research methods used in these studies. The findings are: Metapragmatic judgement item, discourse completion task, role play, and verbal reports are the most widely used instruments in the study of L2 pragmatic competence of Chinese tertiary-level students. Besides, other methods like natural comprehension and elicited conversation have received more attention in recent years.
L2 pragmatics, interlanguage pragmatics, pragmatic competence, research method
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, (32), 233-262.
Dai, W., & Chen, L. (2005). Factors influencing the development of second language pragmatics. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (9), 1-5.
Dai, W., & Yang, X. (2005). The classroom instruction model of L2 pragmatics development. Foreign Language World, (1), 2-8.
Dai, Y., & Zhang, S. (2018). A study of the relationship between the Chinese EFL learners’ oral pragmatic competence and pragmatic transfer. Foreign Language World, (1), 18-27.
He, Z. (1996). What is interlanguage pragmatics? Contemporary Linguistics, (1), 1-6.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Li, C., & Ren, W. (2018). L2 pragmatic competence and subjectivity under the third place theory. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (2), 68-78.
Li, M., Chen, X., & Xiao, Y. (2009). The relationship between Chinese English majors’ personality and their pragmatic and grammatical competence/awareness. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (2), 119-124.
Li, Q., & Bin, K. (2014). Development of English pragmatics of Chinese EFL learners: Recognition and production of English routines. Foreign Language World, (6), 11-20.
Liu, S. (2004). Pragmatic differences between English learners and native speakers. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (8), 14-18.
Lu, J., & Chen, X. (2019). A study of pragmatic disfluency and its acquisition in Chinese EFL learners’ L2 conversations. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (2), 14-23+146.
Niezgoda, K., & Röver, C. (2001). Pragmatic and grammatical awareness: A function of the learning environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ren, W. (2014). A longitudinal investigation into L2 learners’ cognitive processes during study abroad. Applied Linguistics, (5), 575-594.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xiao, Y., & Li, M. (2017). The development of English pragmatic and grammatical competence of Chinese tertiary-level students. Foreign Languages in China, 14(3), 45-54.
Yang, L., & Yuan, Z. (2019). Pragmatic competence development: Complaining speech act by Chinese non English major graduates. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (2), 24-33+146-147.
Ying, J. (2018). A study on CSL students’ pragmatic development in China from a language socialization perspective. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, (5), 24-33.