![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
An Analysis of Tolerance of Ambiguity in Second Language Learning
WANG Daqing
Full-Text PDF
XML 1412 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8072/2021.09.003
Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
In the second language learning, English learners have to face many unavoidable psychological problems, especially the tolerance of ambiguity which plays a vital role in the final result of learning. Traditionally, ambiguity, which means more than two kinds of understandings, is regarded to hindering a learner from making progress. However, based on the cognitive theory, the paper points out that language learning is a moving process from states of doubt and ambiguity to certainty and the tolerance of ambiguity is just the sign of language learning development. The paper also tries to analyze the causes of tolerance of ambiguity from cognitive learning style, learners’ strategies, and self-concern factors. According to the English teaching conditions in China, the balance of tolerance of ambiguity is proposed in order to gain the ideal learning.
ambiguity, tolerance, second language learning
Brown, H. D. (1987). Cognitive and affective characteristics of good language learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50.
Chapelle, C. A., & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predicators of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning, 36(1), 27-45.
Chapelle, C., & Green, P. (1992). Field independence/dependence in second language acquisition. Language Learning, (34), 47-53.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communication approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 47.
Ely, C. M. (1989). Tolerance of ambiguity and use of second language strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 434-455.
Ely, C. M. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity and teaching of ESL. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 87-95). Boston, M.A.: Heinle & Heinle.
Frenkel-Brunwisk, E. (1951). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, 143-180.
Krashen, S. D. (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Prentice Hall International
MacDonald, A. P. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26(3), 791-798.
Mclain, D. L. (1993). The MSTA-1: A new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 183-189.
Norton, R. W. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston, M.A.: Heinle & Heinle.
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21; 87-111.
Rubin, J. (1982). How to be more successful language learner. Boston, M.A.: Heinle & Heinle.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
Upshur, J. A. (1971). Productive communication testing: A progress report. In G. Perren and J. L. M. Trim (Eds.), Applications in linguistics (pp. 435-442). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.