Contact us
![]() |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Justin P. DePlato
Full-Text PDF
XML 1101 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2021.02.002
Affiliation(s)
Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, USA
ABSTRACT
In this article, I examine the theory of executive emergency power,
proffered by George W. Bush, following the attacks of September 11, 2001. In
particular, I examine the administrations interpretation of the Unitary
Executive Theory and the misguided interpretation of emergency power proffered
by former Asst. Attorney General John Yoo. I analyze primary source documents
from the administration, including Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memos, Presidential
Signing Statements, and email exchanges between the officers of the executive
branch. Further, I analyze principle Federalist
Papers, mostly those of Alexander Hamilton to contest the Bush Administration’s conclusions regarding the Unitary
Executive Theory. The findings indicate that the Bush Administration violated
the Constitution, created a new Unitary Executive Theory, and moreover, devised a new interpretation of
presidential emergency power. The implications from the research are very
strikingly clear that the Bush Administration created not just an imperial presidency
during the crisis, but a whole new presidency not bound by the law, or the
Constitution.
KEYWORDS
President George W. Bush’s use of executive emergency powers
Cite this paper
References




