Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

ABSTRACT

Critical discourse methodology is an extremely significant and meaningful branch of systemic functional linguistics which pays more attentions in the formation, diffusion, and acceptability of acertain discourse, and also the investigation on social background; meanwhile it is always used to discuss and pin down those familiar perceptions and ideologies that have been overlooked by the public so that new re-examination can be carried out to dig out some other attractive points. In this paper some basic theoretical basis and methodologies will be explained and then, by applying the critical discourse analysis, the slogans in the protests from Minneapolis to the whole America. Racial discrimination has invariably been a severe social problem for more two centuries in the U.S.A. After the Emancipation Proclamation by Abraham Lincoln, 157 years has passed; however this kind of serious social issue still haunts among every American people. Countless protests have happened in the development of America; thus by analyzing the different types of slogans in this recent protest, novel discovery and meaningful retrospect would emerge.

KEYWORDS

critical discourse analysis, methodology, protest slogans, social background, racial discrimination

Cite this paper

References

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London/New York: Routledge.

Glapka, E. (2019). Critical affect studies: On applying discourse analysis in research on affect, body and power. Discourse & Society, 30(6), 600-621.

Ledin, P. (2019). Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: From metafunctions to materiality. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(5), 497-513.

Merino, Y. (2020). “They were just waiting for me to mess up”: A critical discourse analysis of immigrant Latinx teens’ perceptions of power dynamics. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(2), 605-622.

Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]