Affiliation(s)
1. Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh 12401, Cambodia
2. Division of Research and Extension, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh 12401, Cambodia
3. Faculty of Agronomy, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh 12401, Cambodia
4. Center of Excellence on Sustainable Agricultural Intensification and Nutrition, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh 12401, Cambodia
5. Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, KS 66506, the United States of America
6. Think Oggun, Clebber LLC, Raleigh, NC 27658, the United States of America
7. National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Auburn, AL 36832, the United States of America
ABSTRACT
Vegetables are vital for human health and are consumed five days a week
in Cambodia. However, the production cannot meet domestic demands due to
labor-intensive farming and production costs related to soil tillage.
Mechanization is needed along with soil quality and sustainability improvements
by the adoption of CA (Conservation Agriculture). The
research aimed to compare the performance of the no-till vegetable transplanter
with punch-planter in CA and hand transplanting in CT (Conventional Tillage). The study
was conducted at the Royal University of Agriculture, Cambodia, starting from
January to September 2020, by firstly growing sunn hemp as a cover crop and
then transplanting Thai round eggplant. A randomized complete block design was
used with three treatments, replicated three times. Each plot was 2 m by 15 m,
with 0.2-m row spacing. The results showed that the transplanter speed was 0.54
kmh-1,
almost two times the speed of punch planter and 9 times the speed of hand
transplanting. The highest working capacity was also achieved with the
transplanter. However, different transplanting did not affect plant spacing, or
plant density. Plant spacing was 1 m, and plant density varied from 10,300 to
11,500 plantsha-1.
Plant growth and yield were also not influenced by the transplanter in CA, or
hand transplanting in CT. Average fruit diameter, fruit weight, fruit number,
and yield were 38 mm, 31.4 gfruit-1,
15.7 fruitsplant-1 and 3.9 tha-1,
respectively. The maximum working area of the transplanter and its break-even
area were 25.2 hay-1 and
18.3 hay-1,
respectively. Using the no-till transplanter may save both time and labor, but
its use in combination with CA was unlikely to affect plant growth and yield in
the short term.
KEYWORDS
Break-even area, CA (Conservation Agriculture), economic analysis, plant
growth, roller/crimper, working capacity.
Cite this paper
References