Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Mwansa Kamukwamba
Full-Text PDF
XML 691 Views
DOI:10.17265/1537-1506/2020.04.002
Affiliation(s)
Mulungushi University, Kabwe, Zambia
ABSTRACT
The Tanzania Zambia Railway
stretches 1,860 kilometers from the East African Indian Ocean port of Dar es
Salaam in Tanzania to New Kapiri-Mposhi in land locked Zambia. It is defined as
a bi-national organization as opposed to either transnational or multinational
because it is jointly owned and managed by the Governments of Tanzania and
Zambia. Its construction was made possible by Chinese interest-free loan to the
two Governments. Few development projects in Africa have been charged with as
much political and ideological dynamite as Tanzania Zambia Railway. To the
Western powers, angry that the Chinese had entered territory which they
considered their own preserve, it was a Red Railway intended to thrust
communism into the very heart of Africa. For the white regimes in Southern
Africa, grimly attempting to hold back demands for majority rule, it was seen
as Africa’s Ho Chi Minh Trail, carrying guerrilla further, armed with Chinese
thoughts and weapons to the banks of the Zambezi River. The Chinese regarded
the project as a Friendship Route to strengthen the new African states against
the forces of imperialism and for Tanzania and Zambia it was a Freedom Railway,
which should prove an instrument in increasing their independence. These
reactions underpin not only the complexity of the establishment and management
of a bi-national organization but also present challenges to the two national
trade unions on how best they can represent their members. Industrial relations
literature has cited differences in countries’ historical, social, political,
economic, and ideological background as the main obstacles in the development
of collective bargaining machinery in transnational or multinational
organizations. A study in Tanzania Zambia Railway Authority has attempted to
develop an integrated bi-national collective bargaining machinery whose
collective agreements are likely to be legally enforceable in their respective
countries. This paper explores the development of trade unions in both Tanzania
and Zambia which can be divided in three phases: first, the construction phase;
second, the consolidation phase; and the third and final phase, trade union
liberalization and political pluralism which covers the development of a bi
national collective bargaining model with its Joint Industrial Council
structure and negotiation procedures. The paper compares and contrasts trade
union development in the two contracting states and critically examines how
each phase has influenced trade union development. It provides a brief
historical outline of collective bargaining process and spells out advantages
and limitations of bi-national collective bargaining machinery. The paper
concludes by observing that one of the main objectives of regional groupings is
economic integration and suggests that integrated collective bargaining
machinery be adopted as an ideal industrial relations model for regional
groupings such as the African Union (AU), Southern African Development
Community (SADC), Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA),
Economic Community for West African States (ECOWAS), Eastern African Community,
and other regional groupings around the world since it localizes industrial
relations function in general and collective bargaining in particular.
KEYWORDS
Bi-national organization, Interest free loan, British imperial experience, Unilateral declaration of independence, Integrated collective bargaining, ideological dynamite, Contracting states, economic exploitation
Cite this paper
References