Affiliation(s)
1. School of Mechanical, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia/MG, CEP 38.408-208, Brazil
2. School of Engineering, São Paulo State University, Bauru/SP, CEP 17.033-360, Brazil
3. Mechanical Engineering Graduate Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR), R. Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Bairro Prado Velho, CEP 80215-901, Curitiba/PR, Brazil
ABSTRACT
Grinding operation is a finishing process often employed when high precision
and narrow geometric tolerances are required. These requirements can be achieved
only if cutting conditions are properly selected, especially the cooling-lubrication
technique. In general, grinding is performed in presence of cutting fluid, however,
due to the environmental impacts and costs of the conventional coolant delivery
technique (flow rates from 4 L/min to 300 L/min), alternative cooling-lubrication
techniques have been developed on restriction of the coolants use. Among the several
techniques, MQL (minimum quantity of lubricant) technique has received special attention
from machining users because of its advantages in terms of surface quality of workpiece
and drastic reduction in use of coolant. In this context, this paper evaluated the
performance of the MQL technique as compared to the flood coolant in peripheral
surface grinding of AISI P100 (VP100) steel with conventional aluminum oxide grinding
wheel in relation to the surface roughness
(Ra and Rz). Input parameters tested were equivalent chip thickness (0.09 μm, 0.18
μm and 0.27 μm) and flow rate of the cutting fluid (60 mL/h, 150 mL/h and 240 mL/h)
of the MQL system. Results showed that the grinding with MQL technique provided
lower surface roughness values compared to conventional flood cooling, especially
when machining under the intermediary cutting conditions. Also, with exception of heq of 0.09 µm, the MQL technique
resulted in lower values of Rz parameter as compared to the conventional coolant
technique, regardless of the flow rate tested.
KEYWORDS
Grinding, AISI P100 steel, MQL technique, equivalent chip thickness, surface roughness.
Cite this paper
References