![]() |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
LIU Hongying
Full-Text PDF
XML 1150 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8080/2020.04.002
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Modal discourse markers play an important role in language communication, and the analysis of modal discourse markers is in full swing, but a large amount of analysis focuses on written texts, such as academic writing or celebrity speeches, and few studies on the actual use of L2 learners. This study is conducted based on the theoretical framework of interpersonal meaning in Halliday’s functional grammar, and analyzes the dialogue in the multi-modal spoken corpus of science and engineering college students from the perspective of modality, hoping to provide reference for L2 learning and teaching.
modality System, L2 pragmatic ability, interpersonal function, modal discourse marker
Chen, Y. (2005). Interpersonal meaning of modality in English academic book review. Journal of Taiyuan City Polytechnic College, 4, 171-172.
Dai, Z. Q. (2018). Discourse cohesion and interpersonal meaning: A news review on “cyber war” by foreign media as an example. Foreign Language Research, 6, 41-46.
Gu, J., Gu, X. M., & Sun, D. D. (2019). A comparative analysis of modal words expressing “possibility” in the discussion section of Chinese and foreign English medical journal papers. Journal of Naval Medicine, 40(6), 609-611.
Guan, S. H. (2005). Interpersonal meaning of political speech. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, (4), 216-217.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2000). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold Limited/Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Hou, J. B. (2014). Multimodal interpersonal meaning of real estate advertising. Chinese Foreign Language, (4), 48-53.
Huang, G. W. (2000). A review of the 40 years’ development of Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (1), 15-21.
Huang, G. W. (2006). Linguistic exploration of translation studies. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Huang, G. W. (2007). The purpose and principles of systemic functional syntactic analysis. Journal of Foreign Languages, (3), 39-45.
Li, F. (2011). Interpersonal function analysis of mood and modality system in political speech. Journal of Changchun University of Technology, (12), 80-81.
Liu, F. D. (2019). A comparative study of English and Chinese news discourse modality. Northern Literature, (29), 226-228, 231.
Wang, Q. (2018). Ecological discourse analysis of advertising discourses under the visual threshold of systematic functional grammar―Taking an infant milk powder advertisement as an example. Journal of Shaoguan University, 39(4), 61-64.
Wang, X. (2019). Analysis of interpersonal functions in political discourse from the perspective of systemic functional grammar. Literature Education, (26), 142-143.
Yan, P. F. (2017). Research on modal sequences in second language academic writing of science and technology learners. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 38(3), 40-51.
Yang, Y. S. (2018). Transitivity analysis of advertising English. Journal of Jilin Radio and TV University, (2), 139-140, 156.
Zhang, D. L., Miao, X. W., & Li, X. N. (2005). Functional linguistics and foreign language teaching. Beijing: foreign language teaching and Research Press.
Zhang, P. (2012).Characterization of besieged city from the perspective of interpersonal meaning. Shanhua, (8), 127-128.