 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Orsola Rignani
Full-Text PDF
XML 804 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5313/2020.02.003
Faced with the challenge of arguments about the relation of post-, and trans-humanism, putting forth questions on their “antagonism”, or “convergence”, I propose to (re-)evaluate/highlight the relevance of the thinking of Michel Serres for posthuman debates. It specifically seems to me that Serresian idea of bodily hominescence can be read as a suggestion of “convergence” of post- and trans-humanism. Starting from the assumption that the body is a crucial node of both of them in that its consideration by one and the other marks a major front of their divergence (tool body according to transhumanism, dimensional body according to posthumanism), I seem to grasp, within the Serresian theme of the hominescent body as totipotent/virtual, the idea of bodily virtuality as a point of their convergence. Following Serres’s argument that, due to its virtuality/potentiality (intended as the totality of the possibilities), the body, though always involved in (technological) hybridization processes, is difficult to be artificially reproduced and to be reduced to information, I assume virtuality as an “operational concept” capable of “producing” convergence of post- and trans-humanism. Such a concept allows me, in fact, to read the body (re-)invested, by technology as an infiltrative agent, of a dimensional role as hybridizer (and in this sense normalized). Through virtuality, therefore, I think to be able to understand the body as a meeting ground between trans- and post-component, in the sense that technological “intervention” no longer constitutes an enhancement of the body, but a hybridizing event not implying dis-incarnation but rather normalization of body’s dimensional value; precisely such, due eminently to hybridization with otherness within a process of technological infiltration. The body normalized by such a technology is therefore a trans-posthuman body, in the sense of being contaminated by technological processes keeping it in its dimensionality. In order to better illustrate this idea, I propose to examine Serresian metaphor of the body as a trunk without branches with cultural cut twigs, which seems to me to effectively express the theme of the body as a ground/condition of hybridization, i.e., as an anthropo-techno-poietic dimension. I aim so at showing the relevance of Serres’s thought to conceive, in a convergent perspective, a body, not to be strengthened, but to be normalized in its dimensionality, namely, a trans/posthuman body in a trans/posthumanist context.
transhumanism, posthumanism, body, convergence, Michel Serres, hominescence
Abbas, N. (2005). Mapping Michel Serres. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Assad, M. L. (1999). Reading with Michel Serres: An encounter with time. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Badmington, N. (2003). Theorizing posthumanism. Cultural Critique, 53(1), 10-27.
Barilan, Y. M. (2006). Body worlds and the ethics of using human remains: A preliminary discussion. Bioethics News, 20, 233-247.
Blake, C., Molloy, C., & Shakespeare, S. (Eds.). (2012). Beyond human: From animality to transhumanism. London, New York: Continuum.
Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1-25.
Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies: Philosophy, Technology, Media, 1(1), 9-25.
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Clark, A. (2003). Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crahay, A. (1988). Michel Serres. The mutation of the Cogito. Genesis of the transcendental objective. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Dolphijn, R. (Ed.). (2019). Michel Serres and the crises of the contemporary. London, New York, Bloosmbury.
Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. London, New York: Bloomsbury.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millenium.FemaleMan©_meets_oncoMouse™. Feminism and technoscience. London, New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Jones, D. G., & Whitaker, M. I. (2009). Speaking for the dead: The human body in biology and medicine. Farnham: Ashgate.
L’Yvonnet, F., & Frémont, C. (2010). Michel Serres. Cahiers de L’Herne, 94, 1-317.
Marchesini, R. (2018). Beyond anthropocentrism: Thoughts for a post-human philosophy. Milan: Mimesis International.
Marchesini, R. (2019). Estetica postumanista. Milan: Meltemi.
Moravec, H. (1988). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Moravec, H. (1998). Robot: Mere machine to transcendent mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nayar, P. K. (2013). Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rignani, O. (2018). Metafore del corpo post-umanista: Michel Serres. Milan: Mimesis.
Rödel, P. (2016). Michel Serres: La sage-femme du monde. Paris: Le Pommier.
Serres, M. (1990). Le Contrat naturel (The natural contract). (E. MacArthur & W. Paulson, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Serres, M. (1999). Variations sur le corps (Variations on the body). (R. Burks, Trans.). Minneapolis: Univocal.
Serres, M. (2001). Hominescence (R. Burks, Trans.). London, New York: Bloomsbury.
Serres, M. (2003). L’incandescent (The incandescent). (R. Burks, Trans.). London, New York: Bloosmbury.
Serres, M. (2004). Rameaux (Branches: A philosophy of time, event and advent). (R. Burks, Trans.). London, New York: Bloosmbury.
Serres, M. (2006a). L’art des ponts: Homo pontifex. Paris: Le Pommier.
Serres, M. (2006b). Récits d’humanisme. Paris: Le Pommier.
Serres, M. (2011). Habiter. Paris: Le Pommier.
Serres, M. (2012). Petite Poucette (Thumbelina: The culture and technology of millenials). (D. W. Smith, Trans.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Serres, M. (2014). Pantopie, de Hermès à Petite Poucette. Paris: Le Pommier.
Serres, M. (2015). Le Gaucher boiteux. Puissance de la pensée. Paris: Le Pommier.
Serres, M. (2017). Corps. Paris: Le Pommier.
Watkin, C. (2020). Michel Serres: Figures of thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.