Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

ABSTRACT

The paper aims at investigating the encoding of self-propelled motion events in Homeric Greek in the light of the typology of motion events, taking into account the case of to go. The verbal class of the self-propelled motion refers to those verbs expressing the idea of a simple translational motion, such as to go, to move, without any information about the manner of motion (see, by contrast, the class of the manner-of-motion verbs, such as to run, to swim) or about the path of motion (see, by contrast, the class of the path verbs, such as to enter, to exit). According to Talmy (2000), world languages can be distinguished depending on whether they prototypically express the semantic component of Path in or outside the motion verb. Languages belonging to the S(atellite)-Framed type tend to convey Path outside the motion verb, in a satellite element, such as a particle, an adposition (adpositional phrase), a preverb, an adverb(ial), a nominal case marker. The prototypical encoding pattern of the S-Framed languages, such as Homeric Greek, involves a motion verb conveying Manner and a satellite conveying Path, i.e., [manner-of-motion verb + Path-satellite]. Nonetheless, another pattern is used by this type of languages, albeit less prototypical, which involves a motion verb conveying only Motion and a satellite conveying Path, i.e., [self-propelled motion verb + Path-satellite]. Verb-inherent actionality, namely telicity, turns out to be a strong feature within the ancient Indo-European languages, such as Homeric Greek, playing a role not only in the development of aspectual/tense morphology, but also in the encoding of motion events, at least with reference to manner-of-motion verbs. The present paper aims at verifying the role of inherent telicity within self-propelled motion verbs, through the analysis of Homeric verbs for go. The study takes into account the Homeric suppletive paradigm for go, focusing on ἔρχομαι “go; come” and ἦλθον (aorist) “go; come” (also with reference to the unclear actional opposition between ἔρχομαι and εἶμι “go; come”). From the textual analysis of all the occurrences of both ἔρχομαι and ἦλθον, as well as their co-occurring Path-encoding elements in the Iliad and the Odyssey, data show to what extent verbal inherent telicity plays an important role in motion event encoding also within the class of self-propelled motion verbs.

KEYWORDS

actionality, motion event, Homeric Greek, grammaticalization, self-propelled motion verbs

Cite this paper

References
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1-16). Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 18-20, 1989.
Baldi, P. (2006). Towards a history of the manner of motion parameter in Greek and Indo-European. In P. Cuzzolin and M. Napoli (Eds.), Fonologia e Tipologia lessicale nella storia della lingua greca (pp. 13-31). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Bartolotta, A. (2009). Root lexical features and inflectional marking of tense in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Linguistics, 45(3), 505-532.
Bartolotta, A. (2016). Inherent telicity and Proto-Indo-European verbal paradigms. Rivista Italiana di Linguistica e Dialettologia, 18, 9-50.
Bartolotta, A. (2017a). On syntactic diagnostics as tests for telicity in ancient Indo-European languages. Evidence from Vedic and Greek. Incontri Linguistici, 40(40), 39-63.
Bartolotta, A. (2017b). On deictic motion verbs in Homeric Greek. In F. Logozzo and P. Poccetti (Eds.), Ancient Greek linguistics: New approaches, insights, perspectives (pp. 277-292). Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.
Bartolotta, A., & Nigrelli, C. (2017). Sulla codifica degli eventi di moto in greco omerico: Il ruolo dell’aspetto lessicale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 120(1), 20-39.
Bertinetto, P. M. (1986). Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano: Il sistema dell’indicativo. Firenze: Accademia Della Crusca.
Bertrand, N. (2014). On tmesis, word order and noun incorporation in Homeric Greek. In A. Bartolotta (Ed.), The Greek Verb. Morphology, Syntax and Semantics. Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting on Greek Linguistics (pp. 11-30). Agrigento, October 1-3, 2009. Louvain-La-Neuve-Walpole: Peters.
Bloch, A. (1940). Zur Geschichte einiger suppletiven Verba im Griechischen. Basel. 
Brugmann, K., & Delbrück, B. (1897-1916). Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.
Brugmann, K., & Thumb, A. (1913). Griechische Grammatik, Lautlehre, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre, Syntax. München: Beck.
Chantraine, P. (1953). Grammaire homérique, Voll. I-II. Paris: Klincksieck.
Chantraine, P. (1968-1980). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Paris: Klincksieck.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cuzzolin, P., Putzu, I., & Ramat, P. (2006). The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen, 111, 1-38.
Delbrück, B. (1897). Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.
Depraetere, I. (1995). On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18(1), 1-19.
Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Heine, B. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 575-601). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Imbert, C. (2010). Multiple preverbation in Homeric Greek: A typological insight. CogniTextes, 4. Retrieved from http://cognitextes.revues.org/387
Kölligan, D. (2007). Suppletion und Defektivität im griechischen Verbum. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.
Kuryłowicz, J. (1964). The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Lehmann, C. (1995). Thoughts on grammaticalization. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.
Létoublon, F. (1985). Il allait pareil à la nuit. Les verbes de mouvement en grec: Suppletisme et aspect verbal. Paris: Klincksieck.
Luraghi, S. (2003). On the meaning of prepositions and cases: The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Meillet, A. (1912). L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia, 12, 26(6), 130-148.
Meillet, A. (1926). Sur ἤλυθον, ἦλθον. BSL, 26, 6-7.
Meillet, A. (1929). Grec ἔρχομαι. Memoires de la Societè de Linguistique de Paris, 23, 249-258.
Nikitina, T. (2013). Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In J. Goschler and A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 185-201). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Osthoff, H. (1899). Vom Suppletivwesen der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: J. Hörning.
Pokorny, J. (1959). Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, Voll. I-II. Bern-München: Francke Verlag.
Pompei, A. (2010). Space coding in verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, and F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in Language. Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference (pp. 401-418). Firenze: Edizioni ETS. 
Pompei, A. (2014). Verb-particle constructions and preverbs in Homeric Greek between telicization, incorporation and valency change. In A. Bartolotta (Ed.), The Greek Verb. Morphology, Syntax and Semantics. Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting on Greek Linguistics (pp. 253-276). Agrigento, October 1-3, 2009. Louvain-La-Neuve-Walpole: Peters. 
Rix, H. (2001). Lexicon der Indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.
Romagno, D. (2002). Diatesi Indoeuropea e verbi di movimento greci: Alcune considerazioni sull’intransitività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 87, 163-174.
Romagno, D. (2005). Il perfetto omerico. Diatesi, azionalità e ruoli tematici. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Schadewaldt, W. (1958). Homer, Die Odyssee. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Schwyzer, E. (1959). Griechische Grammatik, Voll. I-II. Munich: Beck Verlag.
Skopeteas, S. (2008). Encoding spatial relations: Language typology and diachronic change in Greek. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF), 61(1), 54-66.
Snell, B. (1955-2010). Lexikon des Frühgriechischen Epos. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III (pp. 57-149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480-520). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring, Vol. II. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Talmy, L. (2009). Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, and Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language. Research the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 389-402). New York-London: Psychology Press.
TLG. (2000). Thesaurus Linguae Grecae. A digital library of Greek literature. Irvine: University of California.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143-160.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Verkerk, A. (2014). The evolutionary dynamics of motion event encoding. Enschede: Ipskamp Drukkers.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1972). On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]