Contact us
 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Elnur Hasan MIKAIL
Full-Text PDF
XML 1928 Views
DOI:10.17265/1537-1514/2013.09.003
Affiliation(s)
Elnur Hasan MIKAIL, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Head of Department of International Relations, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kars Kafkas University.
ABSTRACT
In this study Russian Federation’s current president Vladimir Putin period has been investigated from all aspects. Russian-Turkish relations have a high impact factor from all dimensions for these two countries. Also the secret services of Turkey as Turkish National Intelligence Organization (MIT) and Russia’s old Committee for State Security (KGB) and today’s Federal Security Service (FSB) are really famous intelligence services as well. KGB was a famous and super power Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)’s intelligence service until 1991. After 1991 USSR was collapsed and then new Russian secret service by the name of FSB has been created. Today’s Russia’s president Vladimir Putin was a technological intelligence agent in the Democratic Germany in the USSR period with the colonel degree. In this article we have investigated and researched until the USSR’s collapsing date and since that date until today those two countries: Turkey and Russia’s secret service’s comparison. Also we should take away that the USSR was an empire and Turkey was just a third country as a gendarmerie of USA’s in the Middle East as a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member. This strategic collaboration has been clarified from all aspects.
KEYWORDS
Erdoğan, Intelligence Services, Putin, Russia, The Committee for State Security of USSR (KGB), Turkey, Turkish National Intelligence Organization (MIT), USA
Cite this paper
References
De Figueiredo Jr., R. J. P., & Weingast, B. (2001). Russian federalism: A contradiction in terms. Retrieved November 24, 2001, from http://www.hoover.stanford.edu/publications/digest/014.Weingast.html
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
FBIS-SOV. (1996). Yeltsin Not Satisfied with the Handling of Eurasia (Avrasya).
Key, V. O. (1966). The responsible electorate: Rationality in presidential voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Lepper, S. I. (1974). Voting behavior and aggregate policy targets. Public Choice, 18, 67-81.
Lewis-Beck, M., & Tom, R. (1992). Forecasting elections. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Logan, M. B. G. (1977). Short-term economic changes and individual voting behavior. London: Yale University Publishers.
Mansur, R. (1999). Visual travel guides series (Görsel Gezi Rehberleri Serisi) (pp. 34-123). Ankara: Dost Bookstore Publication.
Misckiewicz, E. (1997). Changing channels: Television and the struggle for power in Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moe, T. (1990). Political institutions: The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6, 213-253.
Remmer, K. (1991). The political impact of economic crisis in Latin America. American Political Science Review, 85, 777-800.
Schmitter, P., & Karl, T. (1994). The conceptual travels of transitologists and consolidologists: How far to the east should they attempt to go? Slavic Review, 53(1), 173-185.
Seligson, M., & Miguel, G. (1989). Ordinary elections in extraordinary times: The political economy of voting in Costa Rica. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Sezer, D. B. (2001). Russia: The challenges of reconciling geopolitical competition with economic partnership. Boulder, C.O.: Lynne Riener.
Tidmarch, C., Lisa, H., & Jill, S. (1984). Press issue agenda in the 1982 congressional and gubernatorial election campaign. Journal of Politics, 46, 1226-1245.
Ul’yanovsk Oblast Committee of State Statistics. (2000). Economic situation in Ul’yanovsk Oblast in 1999 (Ekonomicheskoe Polozhenie Ul’yanvoskoi Oblasti v 1999 godu). Ul’yanovsk: Ul’yanovsk Oblast Committee of State Statistics.
Yeltsin, B. (2000). Midnight chrocicles (Geceyarısı Günlükleri) (pp. 78-90). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Culture Publication.
Zharmukhamed, Z. (2004). Post-Soviet integration in the light of Kazakhstani-Russian relations. Asia Insights, 2, 17-18.
Zhuravskaya, Y. (2000). Incentives to provide local public goods: Fiscal federalism Russian style. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 337-368.