Contact us
![]() |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Encapsulated Fermeherbafit Bioavailability and the Application to Broilers
Author(s)
Ning Iriyanti and Bambang Hartoyo
Full-Text PDF
XML 1134 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-6256/2019.03.003
Affiliation(s)
Animal Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Jl. Dr. Soeparno 60, Purwokerto 53 112, Indonesia
ABSTRACT
The research was conducted to evaluate the physical, chemical and
biologic as well as the bioavailability of encapsulated fermeherbafit in
broiler chickens. Fermeherbafit is a term coined in this study for a mix herbal
fermentation. The materials used were: fermeherbafit material consisting of Curcuma domestica (turmeric), C. xanthorrhiza R. (ginger), Allium sativum L. (garlic), Morinda citrifolia (noni), Moringa oleifera (Moringa leaves), brown sugar and lactic acid bacteria
(LAB) probiotic. Eighty broiler day-old chicks of strain
MB 202 Platinum were reared until the age of 35 d. Research Phase 1 was the evaluation
of the encapsulated ingredients consisted of treatments P1 = 2% alginate:2%
chitosan; P2 = 4% alginate:2% chitosan; P3 = 2% alginate:4%
chitosan; P4 = 4% alginate:4% chitosan; P5 = 2% alginate:2%
chitosan; P6 = 4% alginate:2% chitosan; P7 = 2% alginate:4%
chitosan; P8 = 4% alginate:4% chitosan. Research Phase 2 was the encapsulated
fermeherbafit with treatments R0 = control; R1 =
non-encapsulated fermeherbafit; R2 = 1.5% encapsulated
fermeherbafit; R3 = 3.0% encapsulated fermeherbafit; R4 =
4.5% encapsulated fermeherbafit. The results of Phase 1 study indicated that
the most well-encapsulated fermeherbafit was treatment R7 (2% alginate:4%
chitosan) regarding the levels of protein, energy, LAB amount. The results of
Phase 2 showed that the use of encapsulated fermeherbafit had significant effect
(p < 0.05) on final weight, carcass weight, carcass percentage and liver
weight, but had no effect (p > 0.05) on the
abdominal fat percentage, intestine weight, bursa Fabricius weight, and the
proventriculus weight. It can be concluded that the use of 1:1 of alginate and
chitosan may retain fermeherbafit bioavailability, and its application to the
chicken could be of up to 4.5%, with final broilers body weight of 1,179.75 ± 27.76 g and carcass
weight of 826.7 ± 30.27 g (70.06% ± 1.33%) and liver weight
of 22.625 ± 2.55 g.
KEYWORDS
Fermentation, herbal, feed, chicken, nutrition, carcass.
Cite this paper
References




