Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Emily Kitheka1, Jacinta Kimiti2, Nellie Oduor1, Jane Wanza. Mutinda3, Celestine Ingutia1 and Joseph Githiomi1
Full-Text PDF
XML 471 Views
DOI:10.17265/2162-5298/2019.02.003
Affiliation(s)
1. Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), Nairobi 20412- 00200, Kenya
2. South Eastern University of Kenya (SEKU), Kitui 170-90200, Kenya
3. Kenyatta University, Nairobi 43844-00100, Kenya
ABSTRACT
In Kenya, demand for
biomass energy has increased due to increasing population and urbanization and
high cost of alternative energy sources. This coupled with use of inefficient
production and utilization technologies, has led to increased deforestation,
environmental degradation and increased health impacts. In Kenya, a number of
improved technologies have been developed and promoted; however, adoption still
remains low. This study sought to assess factors influencing adoption of
biomass energy conservation technologies in four selected areas of Kitui
County, Kenya. Data were
collected using a structured questionnaire and guidelines for institutional and
focus group discussions. Sampling was done through purposive and stratified
random sampling. Results revealed three categories of biomass energy
conservation technologies:
energy saving stoves (46%), woodlots (9%) and improved charcoal conversion
kilns (2%). The mean percentage adoption rate in the four study areas stood at
48% with Chuluni having the highest (51%) while Kitui West had the least (46%).
Agriculture (28%), forestry (26%) and NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations)/CBOs (Community-Based
Organizations) (23%) were indicated as the main sources of information, while
field days (35%), community trainings (30%) and demonstrations sites (22%) were
the most preferred dissemination channels. High cost of technologies, lack of
awareness, financial constraints, cultural preferences, gender aspects, lack of
follow up programmes and inadequate capacity to enforce implementation of
existing energy policies and regulation were indicated as key constraints to
adoption of technologies. The study recommends development of a joint
implementation strategy and follow up programmes that will look at the cost of
technologies, dissemination channels and involvement of stakeholders’ in
development and dissemination of biomass energy conservation technologies.
KEYWORDS
Biomass energy, conservation, technologies, dissemination, adoption.
Cite this paper
References