 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Humorous Communication and Comprehension: Manipulation and Epistemic Vigilance
LI Hai-hui
Full-Text PDF
XML 1354 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2019.07.005
Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
This paper takes an integrative approach to the communication and comprehension of humor from the perspectives of the humorist’s manipulation and the recipient’s vigilance informed by relevance theory. It is proposed that, in order to communicate humor, the humorist manipulates the recipient’s expectation of relevance in the setup and in the punchline in two different but related ways: misleading and guiding. It is also proposed that, in order to comprehend and appreciate humor, the recipient exercises vigilance against his/her own shallow processing in the setup and exercises vigilance for special cognitive effects in the punchline. On this approach, humorous communication and comprehension is viewed as an interaction between manipulation and epistemic vigilance. Strategies of manipulation and vigilance are described, and some essential issues arising from the relevance-theoretic approach to humor are reconsidered with some implications drawn. This paper contributes to enhancing the explanatory power of relevance theory for the communication and comprehension of humor.
manipulation, epistemic vigilance, strategy, special cognitive effect, humor
Biegajło, M. (2014). “From which position should I get this joke?!” A relevance-driven interpretation: Naïve optimism, cautions optimism, sophisticated understanding? International Studies in Humour, 3(1), 2-14.
Curcó, C. (1995). Some observations in the pragmatics of humorous interpretations: A relevance-theoretic approach. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 27-47.
Curcó, C. (1996). The implicit expression of attitudes, mutual manifestness, and verbal humour. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 1-12.
Curcó, C. (1997). Relevance and the manipulation of the incongruous: Some explorations of verbal humour. In M. Groefsema (Ed.), Proceedings of the University of Hertfordshire relevance workshop (pp. 68-72). Chelmsford: Peter Thomas and Associates.
Curcó, C. (1998). Indirect echoes and verbal humor. In A. Rouchota & A. Jucker (Eds.), Current issues in relevance theory (pp. 305-326). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Curcó, C. (2007). Irony: Negation, echo and metarepresentation. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 269-293). New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dynel, M. (2010). How puns bear relevance. In M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk, A. Piskorska, & E. Wałaszewska (Eds.), Relevant studies in Poland: Exploring translation and communication problems (pp. 1-12). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
Jodłowiec, M. (1991). What makes a joke tick. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 241-253.
Jodłowiec, M. (2008). What’s in the punchline? In E. Wałaszewska, M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk, A. Korzeniowska, & M. Grzegorzewska (Eds.), Relevant worlds: Current perspectives on language, translation and relevance theory (pp. 67-86). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mazzarella, D. (2013). “Optimal Relevance” as a pragmatic criterion: The role of epistemic vigilance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 25, 20-45.
Mazzarella, D. (2015). Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: The deployment of sophisticated interpretive strategies. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 15(44), 183-199.
Mazzarella, D. (2016). Pragmatics, modularity and epistemic vigilance. Argumenta, 1(2), 181-193.
Oswald, S., & Maillat, D. (2018). Deceptive puns: The pragmatics of humour in puns. In C. Padilla (Ed.), Perspectivas sobre el significado: Desde lo biológico a lo social (pp. 145-171). La Serena: Editorial Universidad de la Serena.
Padilla Cruz, M. (2012). Epistemic vigilance, cautious optimism and sophisticated understanding. Research in Language, 10(4), 365-386.
Padilla Cruz, M. (2014). Pragmatic failure, epistemic injustice and epistemic vigilance. Language & Communication, 39, 34-50.
Padilla Cruz, M. (2015). On the role of vigilance in the interpretation of puns. Humor, 28(3), 469-490.
Piskorska, A. (2014). A relevance-theoretic perspective on humorous irony and its failure. Humor, 27(4), 661-685.
Piskorska, A., & Jodłowiec, M. (2018). Weak communication, joke targets, and the punch-line effect: A relevance-theoretic account. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 13(1), 25-44.
Sperber, D. (1994). Understanding verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa (Ed.), What is intelligence? (pp. 179-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359-393.
Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31-95.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Solska, A. (2012). Relevance-theoretic comprehension procedure and the processing of multiple meanings in paradigmatic puns. In E. Wałaszewska & A. Piskorska (Eds.), Relevance theory: More than understanding (pp. 167-182). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Suls, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in humour appreciation. In P. McGhee & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Basic issues (pp. 39-57). New York: Springer.
Wilson, D. (2017). Relevance theory. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 79-100). New York: Oxford University Press.
Yus, F. (2003). Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1295-1331.
Yus, F. (2013a). Analyzing jokes with the Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 9(1), 3-24.
Yus, F. (2013b). An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The intersecting circles model of humorous communication. In L. Ruiz Gurillo & M. Alvarado Ortega (Eds.), Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse (pp. 59-82). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2016). Humour and relevance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2017). Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes. Lingua, 197, 103-122.