Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Tatsuro Debroux
Full-Text PDF
XML 2530 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2134/2019.06.001
Affiliation(s)
Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
ABSTRACT
This article examines
a concept ‘pacifism’ described by Japanese prime minister and Liberal
Democratic Party's (LDP) president Abe Shinzo and the New Komei Party's (NKP)
leader Yamaguchi Natsuo through a lens of role theory to understand what roles
they think Japan should play. First, how the concept 'pacifism' is used in
statements (speeches, interviews, and remarks on the press) of Abe, Yamaguchi
and other related materials, which are assumed to give a clue about their ideas
of Japan's role in the world related to pacifism, is examined because this
comparison enables to expose accord and discord between them. Second, national
role conception or NRC (an actor’s subjective understanding of the country’s
appropriate role in the world and the perception of domestic and foreign
expectations) about Japan's role and the worldview of each party is discussed
in connection with the issue of the revision of the Japanese Constitution which
stipulates a general framework of Japan's foreign policy. The LDP aims to play
more proactive roles by revising the constitution and Abe dismisses the current
constitution as it makes only 'one-country pacifism' possible.
On the other hand, the NKP tries to maintain the constitution as it is to
protect traditional non-military pacifism.
KEYWORDS
Foreign policy, Security, the Japanese Constitution, The Liberal Democratic Party, The New Komei Party, Role theory
Cite this paper
References