Comparison of Inspection Data by Difference in Odour Inspection Kit (Including Results of Young and Old Age)
Author(s)
Naomi Katayama1, 2, 3, Shoko Kondo4, Yui Nakayama2, Takafumi Nakada5, Seiya Goto3, Satofumi Sugimoto3, WakakoKinoshita3, Masaaki Teranisi3, Michihiko Sone3, Yasushi Fujimoto3, Hironao Otake6, Hirokazu Suzuki5, NaokiSaji5, Seiichi Nakata7 and Tsutomu Nakashima8
Full-Text PDF
XML 707 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-7136/2019.03.003
Affiliation(s)
1. Nagoya Women’s University, Nagoya City 467-8610, Japan
2. Graduate School of Nagoya Women’s University, Nagoya City 467-8610, Japan
3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya City 466-8550, Japan
4. Watanabe Hospital, Mihama Town, Chita-gun 470-3235, Japan
5. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu City 474-8511, Japan
6. Otake Otolaryngology Hospital, Kariya City, Aichi 448-0857, Japan
7. Department of Otolaryngology, Second Hospital Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Nagoya City 545-8509, Japan
8. Ichinomiya Medical Treatment & Habitaiton Center, Ichinomiya City 494-0081, Japan
ABSTRACT
The
present study examined the relationship between olfactory function for ten
years. A personal function test was calculated from the Nagoya Women’s University study database, and the odor stick
identification test and open essence
identification test were administered to healthy young and elderly people. The
participants were community dwellers who voluntarily participated in the Nagoya
Women’s University Study and had managed everyday life by themselves. We
combined data of 2018 and checked two kinds of the olfactometry result. These data were made from a consultation result list which
was handed to a testee by hand. The test age was in his/her 80s from 40s and in
his/her 20s from 10s. The data were compared according to the generation (young
age is 20.1 ± 0.7 years
old and old age is 74.5 ± 10.0
years old). We conducted two kinds of olfaction tests.
The Odour Stick Identification Test (OSIT-J) was used to assess odour
perception. This test possesses high reliability and validity. The OSIT-J
includes 12 different odorants to be identified.
The Odour Essence Identification Test was used to
assess odour perception, too. It also includes 12 different odorants to be
identified. We compared the answer of
generation and compared the results of the two olfactory tests. As a
result, there were no statistically significant differences in the total number
of correct answers in young people and old people in the two olfactory test
results. In addition, we compare young people and old people who increased the
number of correct answer in the two kinds of olfactory examination, the same
person, and those who decreased, but there was no statistically significant
difference. However, there were statistically significant differences between
India ink and perfume and Household (domestic) gas compared with young people and
old people with two kinds of olfactory test results. From the results of this
study, it was found that the results of two kinds of olfactory test can be used
together as a research result for the result of correct answer rate number.
However, it became clear that careful handing is necessary for individual
smell.
KEYWORDS
Healthy
elderly people, healthy young people, olfactory function, the odor stick test,
the open essence test.
Cite this paper
References