![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
SHI Xuan
Full-Text PDF
XML 1049 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2019.03.003
Huashang College Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, China
Wallace Stevens is one of five greatest poets in America in 20th century. The relation between imagination and reality is a major theme of his poems. He holds the view that the mission of poets is to build a bridge linking the world of imagination and of reality with the result of deconstructing the logic of binary opposition since the time of Plato. Thirteen Ways of Looking at A Blackbird is a representative poem that expresses Wallace’s thoughts of deconstruction. This article is to probe into how the poet establishes the reality dominated by imagination and then how he deconstructs the binary opposition between imagination and reality since the time of Plato.
Wallace Stevens, imagination, reality, deconstruction, Thirteen Ways of Looking at A Blackbird
Dong, M, (2012). Western literary criticism key word: Deconstruction. Foreign Literature, (5), 90-119.
Gu, J. (2013). An interpretation of Wallace Stevens philosophical poem Thirteen ways of looking at a blackbird. Short Stories, (17), 73-74.
Liu, S. (1995). Reality•imagination•poetry: A study on Wallace Stevens’ views on poetry. Foreign Literature Studies, (2), 56-61.
Poupard, D. (1984). Twentieth century literary criticism (Vol. 12). Detroit, Michigan: Gale Research Company, Book Tower.
Stevens, W. (2009). Supreme fiction Wallace Stevens’ poems and essays (D. B. Zhang and Z. Zhang, Trans.). Shanghai: East China Normal University.
Wang, X. F. (2018). From structuralism to Derrida’s deconstruction. Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 46(1), 118-122.
Yin, L. J. (2009). A study on the interaction of reality and imagination in Wallace Stevens’ poetry. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Social Science Edition), 42(4), 69-71.