 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Amanda M. Rogus
Full-Text PDF
XML 1197 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8080/2018.09.001
Mary Baldwin University, Staunton, VA
When analyzing the early modern dramatic canon, power and dominance often are viewed as masculine traits. Most men have the powerful position of the household and women serve to be their subservient wives. However, Shakespeare enjoys putting pressure of this notion in many of his dramas. Working to break the demeaning mold of women, he tends to situate female characters in such a way that challenges the social norms of the time. Specifically, looking at the world through Cleopatra’s eyes, she completely confronts societal expectations, as her behavior in Shakespeare’s play challenges early modern gender normativity. The best way to acknowledge this gender role swapping of sorts is to analyze the texts from which Shakespeare obtained these ideas. In the following essay, I will seek to expand on the elements that break gender expectation in literature, specifically utilizing the contents of works that somehow inspired or compliment Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. Using Cleopatra and Antony as the main characters to analyze, I will use the work of Plutarch and Milton to survey the themes of temptation and female dominance. I will then further examine these feminist ideals through a close reading of a passage from Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. The conclusion of this piece will take the literary analysis and close reading into account as a pair to justify an analysis of Cleopatra’s more masculine stance seen throughout Shakespeare’s work.
Cleopatra, Shakespeare, temptation, gender normativity, Plutarch, Milton
Arenburg, M. (2015). Rethinking Hawaa: Gender in Abdilatif Abdalla’s Utenzi wa Maisha ya Adamu na Hawaa through the Lens of John Milton’s Paradise Lost. Research in African Literatures, 46(3), 24-45.
Beck, M. (2014). A Companion to Plutarch. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Bellin, E. V. (1987). The Feminization of Praise: Aemilia Lanyer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton U Press.
Cable, L. (2004). Gender and the Power of Relationship: “United as One Individual Soul” in Paradise Lost. Random House Publishing.
Conway, C. (2017). How to Be a Man in the Grecian World. Retrieved from https://www.ancient-origins.net/man-grecian-world
Dow, B. J. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Communication. Gender and Discussion, 2, 1.
Dryden, J. (1683). Contributions to Plutarch’s lives. In The Works of John Dryden, Vol. 17: Prose 1668-1691; An Essay of Dramtick Posie and Shorter Works (p. 226).
Linder, F. (2001). Speaking of Bodies, Pleasures, and Paradise Lost: Erotic Agency and Situation Ethnography. Cultural Studies, 15(2), 352-374.
McChrystal, D. (1993). Redeeming Eve. English Literary Renaissance, 23(3), 490-508.
McDonald, R. (2001). The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare: An Introduction with Documents. Bedford: St. Martins Pub.
McGrath, P. (2013). Formal Resistance: Gender Hierarchy and Eve’s Final Speech in Paradise Lost. Milton Quarterly, 47(2), 72-87.
Milton, J. & Anna, B. (2008). Paradise Lost. Oxford University Press.
North, T. (2015). The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. London: Penguin Books.
Open Source Shakespeare. (30 April 2017). Retrieved from http://www.opensourceshakespeare.org/
Oxford English Dictionary. (May 2017). Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/
Poole, K. (2008). Naming, “Paradise Lost,” and the Gendered Discourse of Perfect Language Schemes. English Literary Renaissance, 38(3), 535-559.
Shakespeare, W. (1961). Antony and Cleopatra: Shakespeare. London: University Tutorial Book.
Stanislavski, K. (2004). An Actor Prepares (4th ed.). Detroit: Neal-Schuman.
Watson, S. (2012). Constructing Masculinity in Plutarch’s The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Behavioral Psychology and Plutarch, 1, 154-206.