Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Royal University for Women, West Riffa, Kingdom of Bahrain

ABSTRACT

An organization’s costing system is a system that helps the management with the strategy planning while the system plays an important role in providing accurate cost information about the products and customers. In other words, the costing management system is important to provide timely and quality information to help managers in their decision-making process. Producing quality graduates is the main objective of any university and the cost of quality or the cost of poor quality is one that is often difficult to measure in higher education. This can be partly attributed to the fact that most accounting systems are not structured to capture important cost-of-quality information. In order to succeed, many organizations tend to shift from conventional or traditional costing system to Activity-based costing (ABC). ABC provides both higher education administrators and policymakers with better information on which to base decisions. The use of multiple cost pools and drivers under ABC leads to more detailed and accurate product costing than that provided by traditional cost systems. This paper attempts to investigate the possibilities and limitations of implementing ABC in universities. More specifically the study makes use of the case study method to illustrate the implementation of activity-based costing of library services in a private university in the Kingdom of Bahrain. The research methodology of the case study is a combination of both descriptive and quantitative analyses. The study identified six categories of cost pools which are related to the activities of the library as well as 17 relevant cost drivers. Accordingly, ABC should lead to a better understanding of what drives costs and, by extension, what changes are necessary to reduce costs. Unnecessary activities that do not add value to services can be identified and eliminated. Further ABC is feasible in an academic library and that much can be gained from the process of analyzing activities. However, more work needs to be done in terms of designing accounting and other information systems to capture cost and activity transaction data in a more routine and disaggregated form for ABC analysis.

KEYWORDS

costing systems, activity-based costing, quality of information, cost drivers, costing of library services, universities

Cite this paper

Economics World, May-June 2018, Vol. 6, No. 3, 165-176 doi: 10.17265/2328-7144/2018.03.001

References

Ahmed, N. (2012). Implementing the system of costs based on activity in the banking sector an applied study: Rashedbank, atteffhaa branch. AL-Anbar University Journal of Economic and Administration Sciences, 4(9), 326-344.

Chea, A. (2011). Activity-based costing system in the service sector: A strategic approach for enhancing managerial decision making and competitiveness. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 3-10.

Clarke, P. J., & Mullin, T. (2001). Activity-based costing in the non-manufacturing sector in Ireland: A preliminary investigation. The Irish Journal of Management, 22(2), 1-18.

Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. (1988). Measure costs right: Make the right decisions. Harvard Business Review, 66(9), 96-103.

Dražić-Lutilsky, I., & Dragija, M. (2012). Activity based costing as a means to full costing-possibilities and constraints for European universities. Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 17(1), 33-57.

El-Gammal, W., Zakka, J., El-Kassar, A., & Dandash, G. (2016). Reasons behind the non-application of the activity based costing system in developing countries, case of Lebanon. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(3), 417-435.

Ellis-Newman, J. (2003). Activity-based costing in user services of an academic library. Library Trends, 51(3), 333-348.

Estermann, T., & Claeys-Kulik, A. (2013). Financially sustainable universities. Full costing: progress and practice. EUA project. Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.

Fatma, A., & Habib, A. (2014). Contextual factors impact on the use of new management accounting practices: An empirical analysis in Tunisian context. Journal of Research in International Business and Management, 4(3), 45-55.

Fei, Z., & Isa, C. R. (2010). Factors influencing activity-based costing success: A research framework. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 144-150.

Goddard, A., & Ooi, K. (1998). Activity-based costing and central overhead cost allocation in universities: A case study. Public Money & Management, 18(3), 31-38.

Hansen, D., & Mowen, M. (2000). Cost management (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: South Western.

Hardan, A., & Shantawi, T. (2013). Impact of applying the ABC on improving the financial performance in telecom companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(12), 48-61.

Hilton, R. (2001). Managerial accounting: Creating value in a dynamic business environment (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, Irwin.

Ismail, N. (2010). Activity-based management system implementation in higher education institution: Benefits and challenges. Campus-Wide Information System, 27(1), 40-52.

Kamyabi, Y., & Devi, S. (2011). An empirical investigation of accounting outsourcing in Iranian SMEs: Transaction cost economics and resource-based views. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 81-94.

Kaplan, R. (2006). The competitive advantage of management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 18, 127-135.

Kaplan, R. (2013). Intelligent redesign of health care. Retrieved from http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/10/intelligent-redesign-of-health-care/

Kongchan, P. (2013). Factors influencing the implementation of activity-based costing in Thai companies. Doctoral Dissertation, RMIT University.

Kont, K. (2012). New cost accounting models in measuring of library employees’ performance. Library Management, 33(1/2), 50-65.

Krishnan, A. (2006). An application of activity based costing in higher learning institution: A local case study. Contemporary Management Research, 2(2), 75-90.

Kuchta, D., & Troska, M. (2007). Activity-based costing and customer profitability. Cost Management, 21(3), 18-25.

Lotfi, A., & Mansourabad, M. (2012). The investigation and explaining of activity based costing (ABC). Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(3), 2860-2864.

Manuel, C. (2011). The applicability of the principles of activity based costing system in a higher education institution. Economics and Management Research Projects: An International Journal, 1(1), 57-65.

McChlery, S., McKendrick, J., & Rolfe, T. (2007). Activity-based management systems in higher education. Public Money & Management, 27(5), 315-322.

Narong, D. (2009). Activity-based costing and management solutions to traditional shortcomings of cost accounting. Cost Engineering, 51(8), 11-18.

Ng, K., & Ritter, D. (2016). Medicaid expansion and activity based costing as a means of measuring efficiency and improvement in healthcare. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 8, 137-147.

Noreen, E. (1991). Conditions under which activity-based cost systems provide relevant costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3(Fall), 159-68.

Onat, O., Anitsal, I., & Anitsal, M. (2014). Activity-based costing in services industry: A conceptual framework for entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurial Executive, 19, 149-167.

Tatikonda, L., & Tatikonda, R. (2001). Activity-based costing for higher education institutions. Management Accounting Quarterly, 2(2), 19-27.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]