 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Caught in a Trap: Impact Factors and the Scramble for “World Class” Status
Chuing Prudence Chou, Brain Cherry
Full-Text PDF
XML 994 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8080/2017.06.006
National Chengchi University, Taiwan Head of Admissions at the London School of Business and Management, UK
Globalisation has affected many areas of human endeavour and education has not been exempted. The global Higher Education sector is defined by issues of prestige which have led to the formulation of various ranking systems acting as measures of “global excellence”. The spread of these rankings and the uses they are put to in national and international prestige contests has meant that key questions around the global relevance of rankings methodologies have received less attention than their outputs. Governments have embraced them as means of quantifying “progress” and universities themselves have adopted strategies to enhance their positions. These often come with unintended consequences, at the expense of academic endeavour. This paper examines the context of global rankings, the effects of the pursuit of “global excellence” on academic endeavour, and the growing disquiet within the academic community over obsessive pursuit of “world-class status”.
university rankings, SSCI syndrome, impact factors, journal publication, world-class university
Altbach, P. G. (2015). Higher education and the WTO: Globalization run amok. International Higher Education, 23, 2-4.
Bhattacharjee, Y. (2011). Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige. Retrieved from Science: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/334/6061/1344.full
Casassus, B. (2012). €22 billion stimulus brings worries about egalité. Retrieved from Science: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/335/6069/644.full
Chou, C. P. (2014). Why the SSCI syndrome is a global phenomenon? In C. P. Chou, The SSCI syndrome in higher education: A local or global phenomenon. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clauset, A., Arbesman, S., & Larremore, D. B. (2015). Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Retrieved from Science Advances: http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/1/e1400005
Foster, J. G., Rzhetsky, A., & Evans, J. A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875-908.
Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21, 193-215.
Holgate, S. A. (2014). Establishing a sustainable career by breaking the academic mold. Retrieved from Science: http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2014/02/establishing-sustainable-career-breaking-academic-mold
Ioannidis, J., Patsopoulos, N., Kavvoura, F., Tatsioni, A., Evangelou, E., Kouri, I., Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D., & Liberopoulos, G. (2007 (5)). International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal. BMC Medicine, 5, 30-39.
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2015). Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1832-1846.
Post, D., & Chou, C. P. (2016). Preface: Measuring up for what cause? Higher Education Policy, 29(4), 423-429.
Stack, M. (2016). Global university rankings and the mediatization of higher education. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stokstad, E. (2014). Good grades for U.K. university research. Retrieved from Science: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/12/good-grades-uk-university-research
Times Higher Education. (2015). World university rankings 2015-2016 methodology. Retrieved from Times Higher Education World University Rankings: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/ranking-methodology-2016
Turner, D. A. (2005). Benchmarking in universities: League tables revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 353-371.
Usher, A. (2008). Rankings 2.0—The future of university rankings. Evaluation in Higher Education (高教評鑑), 2(2), 51-76.