Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Md. Rifat Hazari, Effat Jahan, Mohammad Abdul Mannan and Junji Tamura
Full-Text PDF
XML 892 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5275/2017.01.007
Affiliation(s)
ABSTRACT
Most
of the controllers of IM (induction motor) for industrial applications have
been designed based on PI controller without consideration of CL
(core loss) and SLL (stray load loss). To get
the precise performances of torque as well as rotor speed and flux, the above
mentioned losses should be considered. Conventional PI controller has overshoot
effect at the transient period of the speed response curve.
On the other hand, fuzzy
logic and ANN (artificial neural network)
based controllers can minimize the overshoot effect at the transient period
because they have the
abilities to deal with the nonlinear systems. In this paper, a comparative
analysis is done between PI, fuzzy logic and ANN based speed controllers to
find the suitable control strategy for IM with consideration of CL and SLL. The
simulation analysis is done by using Matlab/Simulink software. The simulation
results show that the fuzzy logic based speed controller gives better responses
than ANN and conventional PI based speed controllers in terms of rotor speed,
electromagnetic torque and rotor flux of IM.
KEYWORDS
Core loss, stray load loss, PI controller, fuzzy logic controller, artificial neural network controller.
Cite this paper
References