Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Anbar University, Anbar, Iraq

ABSTRACT

This paper aims at throwing a light on the interrelationship of pragmatics and semantics in terms of avoiding misunderstanding and miscommunication between the speaker/writer and hearer/reader. For this purpose, we restrict the sphere with the analysis of headlines from BBC news whose meanings are interpreted by using presuppositional and entailment techniques. Although semantics is concerned only with the literal meaning of the words and their interrelations, pragmatic usage pays attention to the importance of the so called inferred meaning that the speakers and listeners perceive. Presupposition and entailment refer to two different aspects of information. In presupposition, it is the speakers’ circumstantial knowledge while in entailments, it is a conclusion that speakers arrive as a definite type of consequence. Headlines subjectively give clues about or express the most important aspect of the text combining in themselves both semantic and pragmatic meanings and for our analysis of discourse, we will refer to media as a specific form of discourse that is itself a power resource and how media can influence people’s minds, e.g., their knowledge or opinions, revealing integration of among which is the major concerns of the paper. The study, with this in mind, explores the potential of semantics and pragmatic modules introduced by T. Van Dijk.

KEYWORDS

semantics, pragmatics, presupposition,entailment, context, headline

Cite this paper

References
Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Develotte, C., & Rechniewski, E. (2001). Discourse analysis of newspaper headlines: A methodological framework for research into national representations. Journal of French Media Studies, 4.
Galperin, I. R. (1977). Stylistics. Moscow: Higher School.   
Hurford, J., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. (2007). Semantics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krahmer, E. (1998). Presupposition and anaphora. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Leland Stanford Junior University.
Kress, G. (1990). Critical discourse analysis. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Annual review of applied linguistics (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, C. S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saeed, J. (2008). Semantics: Introducing linguistics. UK: Wiley-Black Well.
Sheyholislami, J. (2001). Critical discourse analysis (Unpublished manuscript, Carleton University, Ottawa). Retrieved October 10, 2015 from http://www.server.carleton.ca/jsheyhol/articles/what%20is%20CDA.pdf
Ungerer, F. (Ed.). (2000). English media texts­past and present language and textual structure. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). The semantics and pragmatics of functional coherence in discourse. In A. Ferrara (Ed.), Speech act theory: Ten years later (pp. 49-65). Milano, Italy: Versus.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-271). UK: Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2007). Comments on context and conversation. In N. Fairclough, G. Cortese, and P. Ardizzone (Eds.), Discourse and contemporary social change (pp. 281-316). Bern: Peter Lang.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. UK: Cambridge University.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2012). Discourse and knowledge. In J. P. Gee and M. Hanford (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 587-603). London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse. In C. Hart and P. Cap (Eds), Contemporary studies in critical: Analysis discourse-cognition-society (Version 3.1). Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]