Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
customer@davidpublishing.com
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Salah Alkhafaji, Ph.D., Assistant Dean for Students and Admin Affairs, Sur University College.
B. Sriram, M.Sc., B.Ed., D.C.A., Lecturer and Quality Assurance Officer, Sur University College.

ABSTRACT

Technological innovations have revolutionized the educational technology into various dimensions. Educational processes without educational technology have no value in this modern world. In education domain, the educational software has simplified the processes in greater extend. A proper development methodology has to be implemented while developing such educational software. In particular, the software developed to enrich these education processes should follow a development strategy to motivate the end users to utilize the hypermedia potentials. The software development life cycle (SDLC) has different phases in designing such educational technology and assists the end users to benefit from the modern technology. This study identifies the various factors to be considered at each phase of the SDLC while developing educational software. Also, this study proposes some suggestions to be followed in ESDLC with respect to educational processes perspectives. The core idea of this study is to identify the various issues in implementing such educational software in day to day teaching and learning processes.

KEYWORDS

software development life cycle (SDLC), educational technology, teaching and learning processes, technology innovations, educational software

Cite this paper

References
Adaptive educational hypermedia. (2010). Retrieved December 25, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_educational_hypermedia
Afari-Kumah, E., & Hannah, A. T. (2009). Tertiary students’ view on information and communications technology usage in Ghana. Journal of Information Technology Impact, 9(2), 81-90.
Alkhafaji, S., & Sriram, B. (2010). Educational hypermedia development methodologies. Presented in First Joint Scientific Symposium Committee, CAS, Sultanate of Oman on April 13, 2010 in Sohar University, Sultanate of Oman, Conference Proceedings (pp. 8-24).
Braude, E. J. (2010). Software engineering—An object oriented perspective. Wiley.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowed, G. D., & Russell, B. (2008). Human computer interaction (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Educational Technology Innovation and Impact/Why use Technology in Education/Tactile-Kinesthetic Learners. (2010). Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Educational_Technology_Innovation_and_Impact/Why_use_Technology_in_Education/Tactile-Kinesthetic_Learners
Hoffer, J. A., Joey, F. G., & Valacich, J. S. (2009). Modern systems analysis and design (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Jawadekar, W. S. (2010). Software engineering. McGraw Hill.
Marsic, I. (2005). Software engineering. Rutgers University.
Matrai, R. (2010). User interface. Intech.
O’Neill, K. D., Edelson, D. C., Louis, M. G., & D’Amico, L. (1995). Learning to weave collaborative hypermedia into classroom practice. CSCL Proceedings 1995 in Bloomington, I.N..
Randalph, J. J. (2008). Multidisciplinary methods in educational technology research and development. HAMK University of Applied Sciences.
Riley, D. (2007). Educational technology and practice: Types and timescales of change. Educational Technology and Society, 10(1), 85-93.
Software development process. (2011). Retrieved March 2, 2011, from http://www.ask.com/wiki/Software_development_process
Sommerville. (2009). Software engineering (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sue, C. (2008). The new software engineering. Global Text.
Technology impacts on education. (2010). BBC News. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from www.news.bbc.uk/2/hi/technology/8508040.stm

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: order@davidpublishing.com