Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

China Youth University of Political Studies, Beijing, China

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the cultural studies began to take a linguistic turn. This paper employed the three-dimensioned model of Fairclough, a critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to explore youth subcultures. The cultural discourse of youth in different periods was examined in terms of discursive strategies, discursive practices, and social practices. The analysis shows that the subcultural groups adopt various discursive strategies to resist mainstream ideologies and construct the subcultural ideology and their collective identity. Meanwhile, their discursive practices build effective interaction mode within the subcultural groups. The examples of subcultures reveal that subcultures often emerge in the time of the social and cultural change and reshape the mainstream ideologies and unreasonable social structure.

KEYWORDS

youth subcultures, critical discourse analysis, ideologies, discursive strategies, discursive practices 

Cite this paper

References
Fairclough, N. (1995a). Media discourse. London: Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (1995b). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Faiclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. V. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (p. 258). London: Sage. 
Fairclough, N. (2000). New labor new language? London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Haenfler, R. (2014). Subcultures the basics (p. 12). NY: Routledge. 
Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). Anti-languages. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and society. Beijing: Peking University.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics and racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. NY: Pagrave Macmillan. 
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (2005). Fragmented identities: Redefining and recontextualizing national identity. In P. Chilton and C. Schaffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse (pp. 143-169). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95-120). London: Sage.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]