Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Florida Atlantic University, Florida, USA

ABSTRACT

Despite different views on the existence and development of bureaucracy, bureaucracy is still powerful. The control and influence of bureaucracy in public organizations are still undeniable. This paper explains reasons for the power of bureaucracy. The history for the growth of bureaucracy and the nature of bureaucracy has created strength for bureaucracy. Values such as hierarchy, impersonality, and expertise of bureaucracy are the core mechanisms of bureaucracy. These elements make rational contributions to the development of an organization. The paper asserts that the strength of bureaucracy is undeniable. However, its power is also challenged by its own weaknesses. For instance, rules and regulations, many demands of paperwork (the files), permission, and acceptance from different agencies make bureaucracy become rigid and slow down the implementation process. Its power is more threatened by the development of networks and hollow state, which are more flexible and adapted. Nevertheless, the paper concludes that the power of bureaucracy still exists. Bureaucracy will be powerful if its weaknesses are solved. There should be more focus on dealing with the weaknesses of bureaucracy rather than finding another mechanism that can replace bureaucracy.

KEYWORDS

bureaucracy, power, strength, weaknesses

Cite this paper

Journal of US-China Public Administration, April 2016, Vol. 13, No. 4, 244-255

References

Allison, G. (2004). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In J. M. Shafritz, A. C. Hyde, and S. J. Parkes (Eds.), Classics of public administration (5th ed.) (pp. 396-413). Belmont, CA: Thomas Wadsworth.

Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Beetham, D. (1996). Bureaucracy (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.

Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Brownlow, M., & Gulick, L. (1937). Administrative management in the government of the United States. Washington, D.C.: President’s Committee on Administrative Management.

Chackerian, R., & Abcarian, G. (1984). Bureaucratic power in society. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

Denhardt, R., & Catlaw, T. (2015). Theories of public organization (7th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Farazmand, A. (1997a). From civil to non-civil administration: The biggest challenge to public administration. Proceedings from the 1997 Annual Conference of the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), Philadelphia, July.

Farazmand, A. (1997b). Bureaucracy is alive and well. Public Administration Times 5.

Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509-522.

Farazmand, A. (2002). Organization theory: From pre-classical to contemporary and critical theories—An overview and appraisal. In Modern organizations: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

Farazmand, A. (2009). Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for survival in the 21st century. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1007-1020.

Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and democracy: A theoretical analysis. Public Organization Review, 10(3), 245-258.

Frederickson, G., & Smith, K. (2003). Public administration theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview.

French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and Z. Alvin (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 150-167). New York: Harper & Row.

Gawthrop, L. (1969). Bureaucratic behavior in the executive branch. New York: The Free Press.

Goodsell, C. (1983). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

Hackman, R., & Oldham, G. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hardgrave, R. (1984). India under pressure: Prospects for political stability (A Westview replica edition). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Hargrave, R., & Kochanek, S. (1993). India: Government and politics in a developing nation (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.

Heinrich, C., & Lynn, L. (2000). Governance and performance: New perspectives. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Hummel, R. (2007). The bureaucratic experience: The post-modern challenge. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Hummmel, R. (1976). The bureaucratic experience. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Katz, E., & Danet, B. (1973). Bureaucracy and the public: A reader in official-client relations. New York: Basic Books.

Kingsley, D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy: An interpretation of the British civil service. Yellow Springs, OH: The Antioch Press.

Knutson, J. N. (1972). The human basis of the polity. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton, Inc.

Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Marx, K. (1968). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte and critique of the Gotha Programme. In K. Marx and F. Engels (Eds.), Selected works (pp. 97-180; 319-335). Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

Marx, K. (1970). Critique of Hegels Philosophy of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1971). Writing on the Paris Commune. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

McKinley, G. (1964). Social class and family life. New York: Free Press.

Merton, R. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18, 560-568.

Merton, R. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Milward, B. (1996). Symposium on the hollow state: Capacity, control, and performance in interorganizational settings. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 193-196.

Milward, B., & Provan, K. (2000). How networks are governed. In C. Heinrich and L. Lynn Jr. (Eds.), Governance and performance: New perspectives. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Shafritz, J., & Hyde, A. (2004). Classics of public administration. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.

Shafritz, J., & Hyde, A. (2009). Classics of public administration (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.

Sjoberg, G., Williams, N., & Vaughan, T. (1984). Bureaucracy as a moral issue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(4), 441-453.

Thompson, A. (1969). Modern organizations. New York: Knopf.

Waldo, D. (1952). Development of theory of democratic administration. The American Political Science Review, 46(1), 81-103.

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations (trans: A. M. Parsons, T. Parsons). New York: Free Press.

Woller, G. (1998). Toward a reconciliation of the bureaucratic and democratic ethos. Administration & Society, 30(1), 85-109.

Wood, D., & Waterman, R. (1994). Bureaucratic dynamics: The role of bureaucracy in a democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]