Contact us
 |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Paloma Bernal Turnes, Ricardo Ernst
Full-Text PDF
XML 6715 Views
DOI:10.17265/1537-1514/2016.01.001
Affiliation(s)
Paloma Bernal Turnes, visiting researcher at George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA; tenure professor at Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo Ernst, professor of operations and global logistics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA.
ABSTRACT
Mediation variables are those intervening variables (M) that affect the relationship between the independent variable (X) and the dependent variable (Y). The causal relation between X and Y through the mediation variable M must be established to analyze mediation. M is a mediator, if it involves indirect effects among the set of original variables X and Y. A requirement for a variable to have a causal effect on another is that the cause must precede the outcome in time. This paper argues that the right way to prove the mediation effect is by analyzing different moments in time to support the relations among the variables, which can be done using longitudinal models. The use of traditional analysis in mediation models without the time effect (assumed to occur instantaneously) biases the parameter estimation and could create the possible cancelation of effects, if the paths have opposite signs. Mediation models (without the time effect) are quite frequently used in social sciences. In contrast, the longitudinal mediation model is a very uncommon methodology within the social science community. The aim of this paper is to shed some light about how to analyze the time framework and to provide a methodology to solve the possible limitations that could hinder the robustness of the mediation analysis.
KEYWORDS
multi-mediation, longitudinal analysis, time framework, time intervals, latent growth curve model
Cite this paper
References
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 127-160.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cheong, J., MacKinnon, D. P., & Khoo, S. T. (2003). Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 238-262.
Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558-577.
Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505-528.
Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., & Flaherty, B. P. (1998). An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2), 295-312.
Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58, 80-92.
Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In L. M. Collins and J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243-259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.
Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877-884.
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., Selig, J. P., & Card, N. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 357-365.
MacKinnon, D. P., Coxe, S., & Baraldi, A. N. (2012). Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 1-14.
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173-181.
Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172.
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23-44.
McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analysis with incomplete longitudinal data. In L. Collins and A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 139-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Ramsay, J. O., & Silverman, B. W. (2002). Applied functional data analysis: Methods and case studies. Berlin: Springer.
Sandland, R. L., & McGilchrist, C. A. (1979). Stochastic growth curve analysis. Biometrics, 35, 255-271.
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2-3), 144-164.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2009). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendation. Psychological Methods, 1(4), 422-445.
Sobel, M. E. (1990). Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 55, 495-515.
Zang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models. Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695-719.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Collins, L. M., & Graham, J. W. (2002). The effect of the timing and spacing of observations in longitudinal studies of tobacco and other drug use: Temporal design considerations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68(1), 85-96.