Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Gürhan Uysal
Full-Text PDF
XML 1801 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-7144/2016.02.004
Affiliation(s)
Gurhan Uysal, Ph.D., associate professor, School of Business, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
ABSTRACT
Major indicator of firm performance is business performance. Aims of firms and managers are to achieve firm performance. Human resource management (HRM) aims to achieve individual performance in order for firm performance. Because individuals (professionals) may have an impact on business performance. European HRM is adopting principles of American HRM. This is convergence. There are two factors that may affect divergence between Europe and USA. Divergence factors are social awareness and economic viewpoint difference. First of all, European firms consider social partners in HRM. Secondly, EU is regulated market economy and USA has liberal market economy. That may create divergence between Europe and USA.
KEYWORDS
European human resource management (HRM), American human resource management (HRM), Chris Brewster, social context, performance
Cite this paper
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17(1), 99-120.
Brewster, C. (1992). European human resource management: Reflection of, or challenge to, the American concept? (SWP 38/92, working paper series, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield, UK).
Brewster, C. (2007). A European perspective on HRM. European Journal of International Management, 1(3), 239-259.
Devanna, M. A, Fombrun, C., & Tichy, N. (1981). Human resource management: A strategic perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 51-67. DOI: 10.1016/0090-2616(81)90038-3.
Dickman, M., & Sparrow, P. (2008). International human resource management: A European perspective (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). Imapct of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
Smith, A. (1776). Wealth of nations. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Publishing Company.
Uysal, G. (2013). Dimensions of American SHRM: Human capital, HR systems and firm performance. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 10(7), 720-726.
Uysal, G. (2014). Convergence or divergence between European HRM and American HRM. Journal of Business and Economics, 5(10), 1923-1928.