![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Grammar Consciousness-Raising Tasks and Intermediate Learners’ Achievement and Perceptions
Seyyed Ali Ostovar Namaghi, Maryam Charmchi
Full-Text PDF
XML 1402 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8072/2016.01.001
University of Shahrood, Shahrood, Iran
While there is lots of empirical evidence showing that grammar consciousness raising tasks (GCRTs) have an edge over the traditional modes of grammar instruction, there is very little qualitative evidence reflecting learners’ perceptions of externally imposed educational changes including GCRTs. To extrapolate the previous findings and fill in this gap, this study aims to: (1) test the alleged superiority of GCRTs in grammar instruction and (2) explore learners’ perceptions of learning grammar through GCRTs. To this end, this study used a mixed-method design including a quantitative and a qualitative dimension. The former dimension aimed at testing the superiority of GCRTs on a random sample of intermediate learners from Simin language school in Karaj, Iran through the robust Solomon-four-group design and the latter dimension aimed at collecting and analyzing qualitative interview data on learners’ perceptions of GCRTs. The quantitative results clearly showed that learners being taught through GCRTs significantly outperformed those instructed through the traditional mode of grammar instruction and the qualitative analysis of learners’ perspectives showed that the participants had a positive perception of GCRTs and this positive perception was rooted in GCRTs’ potential to: (1) facilitate the internalization of grammar and (2) involve learners in discovery learning. The findings have clear implications for syllabus designers and practitioners.
consciousness-raising tasks, discovery learning, willingness to learn, traditional approach
Amirian, S. M. R., & Sadeghi, F. (2012). The effect of consciousness-raising tasks on EFL learners performance. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 709-718. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorenson, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research education. USA: Wadsworth. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (pp. 135-145). United States of America: Pearson Education. Crivos, M. B., & Luchini, P. L. (2012). A pedagogical proposal for teaching grammar using consciousness-raising tasks. MJAL, 4(3), 141-149. Doan Dang, T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2012). Direct versus indirect explicit methods of enhancing EFL students’ English grammatical competence: A concept checking-based consciousness-raising tasks model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 113-120. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (2002). Grammar teaching-practice or consciousness-raising? In J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp.167-174). New York: Cambridge UP. Larsen Freeman, D. (2003). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press. Martin, A., & Hughes, H. (2009). How to make the most work integrated learning: A guide for students, lecturers and supervisors. New Zealand: Massey University Press. McNicoll, J., & Lee, J. H. (2011). Collaborative consciousness-raising tasks in EAL classrooms. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 127-138. Moradkhan, D., & Sohrabian, R. (2009). Grammatical consciousness-raising tasks and the improvement of Iranian students’ knowledge of grammar. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(4), 57-71. Sugiharto, S. (2006). Grammar consciousness-raising: Research, theory, and practice. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(2), 144-146.