Autonomy and Performance of Agentification: Cases of Nine Independent Agencies in Thailand

Bank of Thailand. (2014). Fundamental data of Thai economy. Retrieved from http://www.bot.or.th/Thai/EconomicConditions/ Thai/genecon/Pages/index.aspx

Boyne, G. (2002). Researching the new public management: The role of quantitative models. In K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne, and E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 324-338). London: Routledge.

Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2003). Public-private partnerships: An introduction. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 16(3), 332-341.

Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2006). Agencification and regulatory reforms. In T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (Eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modern state. New York: Edward Elger Publishing.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2008). NPM and beyond—Leadership, demography and culture. International Journal of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 5-21.

Christensen, T., Lie, A., & Laegreid, P. (2008). Beyond new public management: Agencification and regulatory reform in Norway. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 15-30.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Sage.

Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V. L., & Green, D. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11.

Dittenhofer, M. A. (2001). Performance auditing in government. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(8), 438-442.

Emni, A., Ozlem, E., Maja, K., Ilan, R., & Florian, S. (2011). Value for money: Current approaches and evolving debates. London School of Economics. Retrieved from http://bigpushforward.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/vfm-current- approaches-and-evolving-debates.pdf

Fedele, P., Galli, D., & Ongaro, E. (2007). Disaggregation, autonomy and re-regulation, contractualism: Public agencies in Italy (1992-2005). Public Management Review, 9(4), 557-585.

Fiscal Policy Office. (2012). Thailand’s economic outlook 2012. Retrieved from http://www.fpo.go.th

Greve, C., Flinders, M., & Van Thiel, S. (1999). Quango’s—What’s in a name? Defining quango’s from a comparative perspective. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 12(2), 129-146.

Hammersley, M. (2000). Varieties of social research: A typology. The International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 3(3), 221-231.

Jackson, P. (2012). Value for money and international development: Deconstructing myths to promote a more constructive discussion. Approach to effectiveness and value for money. OECD Report (1). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dac/ effectiveness/49652541.pdf

Lorsuwannarat, T. (2008). Organizational contexts of autonomy and performance in Thai public sector organizations. Proceedings from EGPA Study Group on Governance of Public Sector Organizations. September 19-22, Madrid, Spain.

Lorsuwannarat, T., Tepthong, S., & Rukhamate, P. (2011). Effectiveness of budget allocation of independent institutions under the Ministry of Industry. Submitted to the Bureau of the Budget, Thailand.

Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state—Causes and consequences from changes in the modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139-167.

Molnar, J. J., & Rogers, D. L. (1976). Organizational effectiveness: An empirical comparison of the goal and system resource approaches. The Sociology Quarterly, 17(3), 401-413.

Norman, R. (2003). Obedient servants? Management freedoms and accountabilities in the New Zealand public sector. Wellington: Victoria University Press.

OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2002). Distributed public governance, agencies, authorities and other government bodies. Paris: OECD.

Office of National Statistics. (2007). Census of industry in Thailand 2007. Economics and Social Bureau.

Office of Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Commerce. (2011). Statistics on Thai international trade. Retrieved from http://www2.ops3.moc.go.th

Office of Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Commerce. (2014). Statistics on Thai international trade. Retrieved from http://www2.ops3.moc.go.th

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474-498.

Osborne, D. (2007). Reinventing government: What a difference a strategy makes. Proceedings from the 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government. June 26-29, Vienna, Austria.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley.

OSMEP (Office of Small and Medium Enterprise Promotion). (2002). White paper on small and medium enterprises 2001. Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion (OSMEP), Ministry of Industry, Bangkok.

Pollitt, C. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear?: An analysis of the impacts of public management reform. Public Management, 2(2), 181-199.

Pollitt, C. (2008). Time, policy, management: Governing with the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: An international comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pollitt, C., & Summa, H. (1997). Trajectories of reform: Public management change in four countries. Public Money and Management, 17(1), 7-18.

Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (Eds). (2004). Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation. London: Routledge.

Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A., & Talbot, C. (2001). Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 3(3), 271-290.

Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H., & Waerness, M. (1999). Performance or compliance?: Performance audit and public management in five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Addison-Wesley.

Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.

Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Schick, A. (2002). Agencies in search of principles in OECD. Distributed public governance (pp. 33-52). Paris: OECD.

Torsteinsen, H. (2007). Agentification in Norwegian local government. Proceedings from XVI Nordic Municipality Postgraduate Conference. November 23-25, Goteborgs Universitet, Goteborg.

Van de Walle, S., & Hammerschmid, G. (2011). The impact of the new public management: Challenges for coordination and cohesion in European public sectors. Halduskultuur—Administrative Culture, 12(2), 190-209.

Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organizational autonomy: A conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101-118.

Walsh, K. (1995). Public services and market mechanisms. Competition, contracting and the new public management. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Wiboonchutikula, P. (2001). Efficiencies and capabilities assessment of Thai small medium-sized enterprises in the manufacturing sector. Bangkok: Faculty of Economics Chulalongkorn University.

World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.