 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Everyday Annoyances and Stress Resilience: Stress Factors of Helping Professions
Petia Genkova
Full-Text PDF
XML 603 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5542/2015.07.002
University of Applied Science, Osnabrueck, Germany
The study at hand focuses the interdependencies between stress incidents and strategies of stress-coping in relation with well-being in helping professions. Furthermore, the scarce areas and the proband’s strategies of health behavior, comparing helping and other vocational groups, are investigated. The sample consist of teachers, bank employees, employees of marketing agencies, employees coming from the machine construction industry, as well as nurses, psychotherapists and physicians. The results show that everyday annoyances and problem-oriented stress-coping indeed affect well-being.
stress, well-being, everyday annoyances, critical incidents, helping professions
Petia Genkova. (2015). Everyday Annoyances and Stress Resilience: Stress Factors of Helping Professions. Psychology Research, 5(7), 400-403.
Bongartz, N. (2000). Wohlbefinden als Gesundheitsparameter. Theorie und treatmentorientierteDiagnostik (Well-being as an indicator of health: Theory and treatment-oriented diagnostic). Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
Cassens, M. (2003). Work-Life-Balance. Wie Sie Berufs- und Privatleben in Einklang bringen (Work-Life-Balance. How you integrate the vocational and private life area). (Executive Summary) München: dtv.
2006). The development of a Spanish language version of the worn out scale of the General Well-Being Questionnaire (GWBQ). Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 94-102.
Ferring, D., & Filipp, S. H. (1989). BewältigungkritischerLebensereignisse: ErsteErfahrungenmiteinerdeutschsprachigen Version der “Ways of Coping Checklist” (Coping of critical life incidents: First experiences with the German version of the “Ways of Coping Checklist”). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie (Journal of Differential and Diagnostic Psychology), 10, 189-199.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337-421.
Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale (electronic version). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218.
Jerusalem, M. (1990). PersönlicheRessourcen, Vulnerabilität und Streßerleben (Personal resources, vulnerability and experience of stress). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Nitsch, J. (1981). Stress. Theorien, Untersuchungen, Maßnahmen (Stress. Theories, investigations, measures). Bern: Huber.
Richter, P., Buruck, G., Nebel, W., & Wolf, S. (2011). Arbeit und Gesundheit. Risiken, Ressourcen und Gestaltung (Work andhealth. Risks, resourcesanddesign). In E. Bamberg, A. M. Metz, & A. Ducki (Eds.), Handbuch Gesundheitsförderung und Gesundheitsmanagement in der Arbeitswelt (Handbook ofhealth-promotion andHealth Management in theworkingworld) (pp. 25-61). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Zapf, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2004). Stress und Gesundheit in Organisationen (Stress andhealth in organizations). In H. Schuler (Ed.), Organisationspsychologie—Grundlagen und Personalpsychologie (Organisational psychology—Basics and personnel psychology) (pp. 1007-1112). Göttingen: Hogrefe.