![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Some Martial Motifs as Embedded Into Turkish Traditions
Sinan Çaya
Full-Text PDF
XML 811 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5526/2015.04.008
Istanbul University, Turkey
Turkish people traditionally make good soldiers. In the Republican Turkey, the draft [conscript service system is the valid application whereby privates (rankless plain soldiers)] are recruited from among healthy and young male citizens, for a specific term specified by law. Such draftees (conscrips) constitute the backbone of the military man-power. Their numbers attain figures much bigger than the numbers of rank-carrying personnel, namely the petty-officers and officers (generals are very few in number). It is a widely known fact that military life, all over the world, is indeed tough and this is especially true for the rank-and-file, who constitute the lowest levels or the base of the involved hierarchical pyramide. When conscripted for the service, the crushing majority of the young lads go to serve willingly (see Figure 1) and proudly and even with pleasure (see Figure 2). Those who do not readily render themselves to the armed forces are only a small minority. The reason for that is the high prestige enjoyed by all military personnel within the society. Deeply-rooted historical and cultural interpretations come into play, to make us understand the significance and even the sacredness of the armed service. Indeed, merely a collection of songs and ballads praising military themes, justifies the high value of soldierly ways for Turkisp people.
Soldier, conscript, army, military
Sociology Study, April 2015, Vol. 5, No. 4, 323-333
Ayın, F. 1994. “Tanzimat’ın İlanından Sonraki Askter Alma Kanunları” (Rules to Conscript After the Ottoman Reformation). Silahlı Kuvvetler Dergisi (Journal of Armed Forces) 116(339).
Erendil, M. 2000. “Mehmetçik” [Little Mehmet (Turkish-Johnny)]. Silâhlı Kuvvetler Dergisi (Journal of Armed Forces) 119(365).
Grigoriy, P. 1994. Akzambaklar Ülkesi Finlandiya’da (In Finland, the Land of the White Lillies). Translated by A. H. Aytuna. İstanbul: Inkılâp Kitabevi.
Kışlalı, A. T. 1967. Forces politiques dansla Turqouiemoderne (Political Forces in Modern Turkey). Ankara: Sevinç Printing House.
Lang, K. 1970. “Military Sociology 1963-1969.” La Sociologie Contemporaine/Current Sociology 16(3). The Hague; Paris: Mouton and Co.
Linderman, G. F. 1990. “Military Leadership and the American Experience.” Military Review, April.
Nelson, H. D. and I. Kaplan, 1979. “National Security.” In Turkey: A Country Study, edited by R. F. Nyrop. Washington, D.C.: The American University Publications.
Şen, F. 1986. Turkei, Land und Leute (Turkey: The Land and the People). 2nd ed. München: Verlag C.H.Beck.
Şengör, A. M. C. 2000. “Is the Military Defensible?” The Wings Magazine, March. Yeşilyurt, Istanbul: Hava Harp Okulu (Air Force College) Publication.
Stüwe, M. 1974. Türkei Heute (mit 33 Abbildungen) [Turkey Today (With 33 Illustrations)]. Wien and Düsseldorf: Econ-Verlag GmbH.
Ülger, S. E., ed. 1992. Atatürk und die Türkei in der Deutschen Presse (1910-1944) [Atatürk and Turkey in the German Media (1910-1944)]. Hückelhoven: Schulbuchverlag Anadolu.