 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Study on Authoritarian Leader-Member Relationship
Pingping Liu, Hui Wang
Full-Text PDF
XML 1481 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6591/2015.04.006
Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China; Peking University, Beijing, China
Authoritarian leadership is one of the main ways of paternalistic leadership. Firstly, the paper briefly describes the characteristic of authoritarian leadership, the leadership behavior, and the member reaction. And then, the paper studies on authoritarian leader-member relationship based on the organization-team-individual level. Specifically, based on the organization level variable, it analyses authoritarian leader-member relationship from three fields that are organization structure, organization ethics and culture, and organization commitment. Based on the team level variable, it analyses authoritarian leader-member relationship from three fields that are team communication and atmosphere of perceived consistency, team conflict and colleague relationship, team performance. Based on the individual level variable, it analyses authoritarian leader-member relationship from three fields that are individual behavior, individual attitude including subjective well-being, and individual job satisfaction. Through the above analysis, the authors expect that they can further promote the research on authoritarian leader-member relationship.
authoritarian
relationship, leader-member relationship, organization-team-individual level
Journal of US-China Public Administration, April 2015, Vol. 12, No. 4, 304-313
Calabrese, K. R. (2000). Interpersonal conflict and sarcasm in the workplace. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(4), 459-494.
Chan, S. C. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: Does information sharing. Human Relations, 4, 1-27.
Chen, X.-P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T.-J., Farh, J.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796-819.
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader-member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1104-1120.
Fan, J. L. (1995). My comments on “different pattern and Chinese organizational behavior”. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 3, 219-237.
Fan, J. L., & Zheng, B. X. (2000). Paternalistic leadership of Chinese organizations: A analysis of the cultural perspective. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 13, 127-180.
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, and E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84-127). London: Macmillan.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 517-534.
Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., & Kiewitz, C. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 512-519.
Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The expression of emotion in organizational life. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 1-42). Greenwich, C.T.: JAI Press.
Ren, X. P., & Wang, H. (2005). Leader-member exchange and its process theory, measurement, antecedents and outcomes. Advances in Psychological Science, 13(6), 788-797.
Rutter, P. R., & Fielding, P. J. (1988). Sources of occupational stress: An examination of British prison officers. Work and Stress, 2, 292-299.
Schlösser, O., Frese, M., & Heintze, A.-M. (2014). Human orientation as a new cultural dimension of the GLOBE Project: A validation study of the GLOBE scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(4), 535-551.
Wang, H. (2008). Leadership behavior in organization. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, G. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: An empirical study in the Chinese context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1809-1824.
Wang, Z., & Zhong, L. F. (2011). Leader-member exchange differentiation: A review and agenda for future research. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(7), 1037-1046.
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research on organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 1-74). Greenwich, C.T.: JAI Press.
Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for “paternalistic headship” among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18, 445-480.
Yu, H. B., Zheng, X. M., & Fang, L. L. (2008). How to lead the organizational learning: A relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational learning. Science Research Management, 29(5), 23-30.
Zheng, B. X. (1995). Relationship between parental authority and leadership behavior: A case study of Taiwanese private enterprises. Institute of Ethnology Quarterly of Central Research Institute, 79, 119-173.
Zheng, B. X., Zhou, L. F., & Fan, J. L. (2000). Paternalistic leadership: Construction and measurement of tri-mode. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3-64.