Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Zambian Open University, Lusaka, Zambia

ABSTRACT

Knowledge and perceptions of urban health hazards may vary in different communities. An attempt was made to study the levels of knowledge and perceptions on urban health hazards in Zambia: a case study of Kitwe District. The study was done in Nkana West, Chimwemwe, and Saint Anthony (St. Anthony). The respondents in these areas identified the following factors as being hazardous: air pollution, promiscuous behavior, sanitation, poor houses, solid and faecal waste management, noise, lack of recreational facilities, inadequate food supplies, life styles, and overcrowdings. The study revealed that 98% of respondents knew at least a health hazard while 2% of them did not know of any. Of the 98%, there were 39.6% responses indicated that air pollution was the most hazardous followed by unhygienic environments with 35.9%. Promiscuous behavior, inadequate food supply, and garbage (solid waste) disposal with 32.1%, 30.2%, and 28.3%, respectively, were some of the most common. The responses given were related to the socio-economic status of the sample areas. The respondents were of the perception that the government was to blame over the rates of air pollution and sanitation. However, some respondents acknowledged the blame of disposing solid waste in undesignated areas. The promiscuous behavior was attributed to inadequate recreation facilities, unemployment, and a lot of beer outlets. There was therefore, need for government through the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Kitwe City Council (KCC) to carry basic health campaigns on the environmental health hazards. The construction of houses should be monitored by the housing (buildings) department of the KCC in order to avoid people putting up buildings where the drainage canals are supposed to pass. This would help minimize water logging.

KEYWORDS

hazard, health, knowledge, perceptions, urban

Cite this paper

Journal of US-China Public Administration, April 2015, Vol. 12, No. 4, 262-272

References

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (1998). Public health statement for sulfur dioxide. Retrieved from http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov

Akhtar, R. (1988). Perceptions of urban health hazards: Examples from Lusaka. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(2-3), 167-172.

American Cancer Society. (2013). Carcinogenic effects of air pollution. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org

Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. W. (1978). The environment as hazard. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). (2013). Effects of sulphur oxide on health. Retrieved from http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ chemicals/chemical profiles/ sulfurdi.Html

Central Statistical Office (CSO). (2012). 2010 census of population and housing: Population summary report. Lusaka: CSO.

Chanda, R. (2004). Trade in health services. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/trade/resource/THS/en/

Environmental Council of Zambia (ECZ). (2005). State of environment reporting in Zambia: Proceedings of a training workshop on indicator development. Lusaka: ECZ.

Government of the Republic of Zambia and United Nations Development Programme (GRZ & UNDP). (2013). Millennium development goals—Progress report: Zambia 2013. GRZ and UNDP, Lusaka.

Lusakatimes.com. (2012). The choking fumes in Kitwe. Retrieved from http://www.lusakatimes.com

Palichino, M., & Mollet, P. (2003). Better urban mobility in developing countries. Brussels: International Association of Public Transport.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]