Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Granada, Granada, Spain

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency of the regional management centres that make up the tax administration in Spain. They are known as Special Tax Offices and coincide with the different Autonomous Communities which comprise the political structure of the Spanish State. The aim has first been to measure their results and then compare them, as they all use the same inputs and provide the same outputs. To achieve this, the authors have used a methodology based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) in order to estimate the technical efficiency of the Special Tax Offices in 2008. The results show, using the premise of variable returns to scale, that there are four offices which behave optimally compared with the others, namely the Special Tax Offices of Andalusia, Castile-La Mancha, Catalonia, and La Rioja. On the other hand, the offices of Castile and León and Extremadura stand out for being the most inefficient ones. This analysis shows which offices have the best results and should act as a model for those who have the worst results, as if this is done, it would be possible to reinforce the fight against tax fraud that is so widespread in Spain and tax revenues could be increased. 

KEYWORDS

Tax Administration Agency, Special Tax Offices, technical efficiency, data envelopment analysis (DEA)

Cite this paper

Journal of US-China Public Administration, ISSN 1548-6591, January 2013, Vol. 10, No. 1, 49-56

References

AEAT (The State Tax Administration Agency). (2008). Report of the economic and financial management. Spanish Government.

Avkiran, N. K. (1999). Productivity analysis in the services sector with data envelopment analysis. The University of Queensland.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.

Bordas, M. (2012). Tradition and modernization in the public administration—Efficient state or state under the rule of law. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 9(6), 601-619.

Boronska-Hryniewiecka, K. (2011). Institutional adaptation to Europeanization in the state of asymmetries: Participation of the Spanish autonomous communities in the European affairs. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 8(1), 16-33.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

El-Mahgary, S., & Lahdelma, R. (1995). Data envelopment analysis: Visualizing the results. European Journal of Operational Research, 85, 700-710.

Esteller, A. (2003). The efficient administration of assigned taxes: An explanatory analysis. Papeles de Economía Española, 95, 320-334.

Faría, A., & Yucelik, Z. (1995). The interrelationship between tax policy and tax administration. In P. Shome (Ed.), Tax Policy Handbook (pp. 267-272). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120(III), 253-290.

Gale, W. G., & Holtzblatt, J. (2000). The role of administrative issues in tax reform: Simplicity, compliance, and administration. In G. R. Zodrow and P. Mieszkowski (Eds.), United States Tax Reform in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

González, X. M., & Miles, D. (2000). Efficiency in the tax inspectorate. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 24(3), 203-219.

Hunter, W. J., & Nelson, M. A. (1996). An IRS production function. National Tax Journal, 49(1), 105-115.

Hyun, J. K., Moon, CH. G., & An, CH. B. (2001). Production analysis of tax administration with multiple outputs: The case of Korea. Proceedings from 57th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance. Linz, Austria.

Jha, R., & Sahni, B. S. (1997). Tax efficiency and productivity analysis: The case of Canadian Fiscal Federalism. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 52(2), 186-197.

Jha, R., Mohanty, M. S., Chatterjee, S., & Chitkara, P. (1999). Tax efficiency in selected Indian states. Empirical Economics, 24, 641-654.

Jiménez, J. D., & Barrilao, P. E. (2001). An approach to the efficient management of the State Agency of Tax Administration. Papeles de Economía Española, 87, 221-228.

Jiménez, J. D., & Barrilao, P. E. (2003). Tax administration in Spain. A management analysis through income and expenditure. Working Paper No. 175/2003. Foundation Confederate Savings for Economic and Social Research.

Lasheras, M., & Herrera, C. (1991, June). Tax administration and fiscal system: A comparative analysis. Proceedings from the International Seminar in Public Economics. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.

Lewis, B. D. (2006). Local government taxation: An analysis of administrative cost efficiency. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 42, 213-233.

Maekawa, S., & Atoda, N. (2001). Technical inefficiency in Japanese tax administration. Proceedings from 57th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance. Linz, Austria.

Oral, M., & Yolalan, R. (1990). An empirical study on measuring operating efficiency and profitability of bank branches. European Journal of Operational Research, 46(3), 282-294. 

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]